Cited by 116Doping in SportsPharmacological Effects and AssaysPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

The anti-doping hot-line, a means to capture the abuse of doping agents in the Swedish society and a new service function in clinical pharmacology

Ekl�f, Ann-Charlotte, Thurelius, Ann-Mari, Garle, Mats, Rane, Anders, Sj�qvist, Folke·2003·European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

With the support of the Swedish National Institute of Health a national information service was started in 1993 aiming to capture the abuse of doping agents in the general public. It was organized as a telephone service, called the Anti-Doping Hot-Line, from our department and managed by trained nurses co-operating with clinical pharmacologists. Important information collected about all callers (anonymous) was: date of call, its origin, category of caller, doping experience and main question being asked. Abusers were asked about their age, sex, affiliation, abused drug(s), duration of abuse, habit of administration and adverse reactions (ADRs). Between October 1993 and December 2000 25,835 calls were received with a peak during spring and autumn. Most calls (12,400) came from non-abusers, 60% being males. Callers connected with gyms represented the largest group (30%). Most calls about specific drugs concerned anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS). Other drugs or products included ephedrine, clenbuterol and creatine. The most commonly abused anabolic steroids were testosterone, nandrolone-decanoate, methandienone and stanozolol. The ten most commonly reported ADRs of AAS were aggressiveness (835), depression (829), acne (770), gynecomastia (637), anxiousness (637), potency problems (413), testicular atrophy (404), sleep disorders (328), fluid retention (318) and mood disturbances (302). Female side effects included menstruation disturbances, hair growth in the face, lower voice and enlarged clitoris. During the period 1996-200, totally 4339 persons reported about 10,800 side effects. This figure should be compared with the very low number of ADRs (27) reported by prescribers to the Swedish ADR committee during the same period. Abuse of doping agents appears to be a new public health problem that needs detection, medical care and prevention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00228-003-0633-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 116

Authors
Ekl�f, A.-C., Thurelius, A.-M., Garle, M., Rane, A., & Sj�qvist, F.
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2003-11-01
Volume
59
Issue
8-9
Pages
571-577
ISSN
  • 0031-6970 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1041
OpenAlex
W2161254243
Cited by
116
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
performance-enhancing drugs, anabolic steroids, adverse drug reactions, telephone information services, gym members, ephedrine, clenbuterol, creatine, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Androgens, Doping in Sports, Female, Humans, Information Services, Male, Middle Aged, Steroids, Sweden, Hotlines, Substance-Related Disorders, Fitness Centers, Anabolic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review