Cited by 84Antibiotic Use and ResistanceHealthcare cost, quality, practicesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Changing antibiotics prescribing practices in health centers of Khartoum State, Sudan

Awad, A. I., Eltayeb, I. B., Baraka, O. Z.·2006·European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Objective A major problem with inappropriate use of antibiotics is the emergence of resistance. Thus, cost-effective interventional strategies are required to improve their use. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of multifaceted interventions on prescribing practices of antibiotics in health centers of Khartoum State, Sudan.Methods Twenty health centers were randomly assigned to receive: (1) no intervention; (2) audit and feedback; (3) audit and feedback + seminar; or (4) audit and feedback + academic detailing. A total of 1,800 patient encounters, 30 from each health center, were randomly collected. The total number of encounters with antibiotics prescribed were determined in each health center and they were evaluated with regard to antibiotic choice, dose and duration of therapy before the study and at 1 and 3 months post-intervention.Results In comparison to the control group, the prescriber targeted interventions involving audit and feedback, together with academic detailing (4), reduced the mean number of encounters with an antibiotic prescribed by 6.3 and 7.7 (p<0.001) at 1 and 3 months post-intervention, respectively. In addition, the mean number of encounters with an inappropriate antibiotic with respect to diagnosis, doses and/ or duration of therapy was reduced by 5.3 and 5.9 (p<0.001) at 1 and 3 months post-intervention, respectively. For audit and feedback together with seminars (3) and for audit and feedback alone (2), the corresponding reductions were 5.3, 7.1, 4.4 and 5.1 (p<0.001) and 1.4, 2.8, 1.8 and 1.9 (p>0.05), respectively.Conclusion Inappropriate prescribing patterns of antibiotics in health centers of Khartoum State, Sudan, are alarmingly high. Multifaceted interventions involving audit and feedback combined with either academic detailing or seminars appear more effective in changing prescribing practices of antibiotics than audit and feedback alone.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00228-005-0089-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Awad 2006 found that adding seminars to audit and feedback reduced inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics in Sudan (adjusted change relative to baseline control = 26%; P < 0.001).

    “Awad 2006 (adjusted change relative to baseline control = 26%; P < 0.001) found that adding seminars to audit and feedback reduced inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics in Sudan”
  • Awad 2006 found a small effect on inappropriate antibiotic prescribing with academic detailing compared to audit and feedback alone (adjusted change relative to baseline performance in the audit and feedback alone arm = 29%, P < 0.001).

    “Awad 2006 ‐ adjusted change relative to baseline performance in the audit and feedback alone arm = 29%, P < 0.001”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 84

Authors
Awad, A. I., Eltayeb, I. B., & Baraka, O. Z.
Affiliations
  • Kuwait University (KW)
  • University of Khartoum (SD)
Corresponding author
Awad, A. I.
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2006-01-03
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
135-142
ISSN
  • 0031-6970 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1041
OpenAlex
W2062734487
Cited by
84
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
antibiotic prescribing, inappropriate prescribing, audit and feedback, academic detailing, seminars, multicomponent intervention, antimicrobial resistance, health centers, Khartoum State
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Data Collection, Education, Medical, Continuing, Feedback, Humans, Medical Audit, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Drug Prescriptions, Primary Health Care, Sudan, Drug Resistance, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review