The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Population pharmacokinetic analysis of infliximab in patients with ulcerative colitis
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Infliximab, a monoclonal antibody, is approved for the treatment of inflammatory diseases at doses that depend on the patient disease population. It was the aim of this study to evaluate its population pharmacokinetics in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis and characterize patient covariates that affect its disposition in this population. METHODS: Information collected from 482 patients in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled international studies were analyzed using NONMEM. RESULTS: A two-compartment, population pharmacokinetic model described the serum infliximab concentration-time data. Population pharmacokinetic estimates (typical value +/- standard error), based on the final covariate model, were clearance (CL: 0.407 +/- 0.0103 L/day), apparent volumes of distribution in the central (V(1): 3.29 +/- 0.0679 L) and peripheral (V(2): 4.13 +/- 0.16 L) compartments, and intercompartment clearance (Q: 7.14 +/- 0.489 L/day). Infliximab exhibited interindividual variability for CL and V(1) of 37.7% and 22.1%, respectively. Infliximab t(1/2) is approximately 14 days. Covariate analysis showed that V(1) increased as body weight increased, and CL was higher in patients who developed antibodies to infliximab. An additional novel covariate, serum albumin concentration, was found to be inversely and strongly related to infliximab clearance in this population. CONCLUSIONS: The disposition of infliximab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis, unlike in rheumatoid arthritis, was not affected by coadministration of immunomodulators and corticosteroids but was related to formation of antibodies to infliximab and, notably, to serum albumin levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kim, J., Hayton, W. L., Robinson, J. M., & Anderson, C. L. (2007) · Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.clim.2006.09.001 · Cited by 208
Cited by
Population Pharmacokinetics of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies
Dirks, N. L., & Meibohm, B. (2010) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/11535960-000000000-00000 · Cited by 500
Ordás, I., Mould, D. R., Feagan, B. G., & Sandborn, W. J. (2012) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.2011.328 · Cited by 498
Mitrev, N., Vande Casteele, N., Seow, C. H., Andrews, J. M., Connor, S. J., Moore, G. T., Barclay, M., Begun, J., Bryant, R., Chan, W., et al. (2017) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.14368 · Cited by 282
Deng, R., Jin, F., Prabhu, S., & Iyer, S. (2012) · Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology · doi:10.1517/17425255.2012.643868 · Cited by 126
Potential Sources of Inter-Subject Variability in Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics
Gill, K. L., Machavaram, K. K., Rose, R. H., & Chetty, M. (2016) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.1007/s40262-015-0361-4 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Fasanmade, A. A., Adedokun, O. J., Ford, J., Hernandez, D., Johanns, J., Hu, C., Davis, H. M., & Zhou, H.
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Published
- 2009-09-16
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1211-1228
- ISSN
- 0031-6970 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1041
- OpenAlex
- W2044160586
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population pharmacokinetic analysis of infliximab in patients with ulcerative colitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00228-009-0718-4
- The paper
- Fasanmade, A. A., Adedokun, O. J., Ford, J., Hernandez, D., Johanns, J., Hu, C., Davis, H. M., & Zhou, H. (2009). Population pharmacokinetic analysis of infliximab in patients with ulcerative colitis. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-009-0718-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.