Cited by 41Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Treatment discontinuation with methylphenidate in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Castells, Xavier, Cunill, Ruth, Capellà, Dolors·2013·European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Background Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adulthood is increasingly diagnosed and treated. Methylphenidate is frequently advocated as a first-line pharmacological treatment. Purpose The aim of our study was to compare all-cause discontinuation rate of methylphenidate and its pharmaceutical presentations with placebo in adults with ADHD. Methods This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing methylphenidate with placebo in adults with ADHD. All-cause treatment discontinuation was the primary endpoint. The efficacy in reducing ADHD symptoms and safety were the secondary endpoints. Results Twelve studies (2,496 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Four racemic methylphenidate and one dexmethylphenidate presentations were investigated. The rate of all-cause treatment discontinuation was greater with methylphenidate than with placebo, but this difference was not statistically significant [odds ratio (OR) 1.19, 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 0.82-1.74, P = 0.37, I(2) = 64 %] This finding reached the conventional threshold of statistical significance after one outlier study was excluded (OR 1.44, 95 % CI 1.14-1.82, P = 0.002, I(2) = 0). Methylphenidate was more efficacious than placebo for reducing ADHD symptoms and it was associated with a higher proportion of patients dropping out due to adverse effects. Conclusions Despite reducing ADHD symptoms, methylphenidate showed no advantage over placebo in terms of treatme…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00228-012-1390-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The acceptability of MPH treatment in adult ADHD was not greater than that of placebo (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.74).

    “According to a recent meta-analysis, the acceptability of MPH treatment in adult ADHD was not greater than that of placebo (odds ratio [OR] 95% CI of 1.19 [0.82, 1.74]).37”
  • The acceptability of OROS MPH in a recent review was worse than that of placebo.

    “Unfortunately, the acceptability of OROS MPH in a recent review was worse than that of placebo.37”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 54 · Cited by 41

Authors
Castells, X., Cunill, R., & Capellà, D.
Affiliations
  • Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (ES)
  • Universitat de Girona (ES)
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2012-09-16
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
347-356
ISSN
  • 0031-6970 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1041
OpenAlex
W2028952686
Cited by
41
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
adult ADHD, methylphenidate, treatment discontinuation, dexmethylphenidate, placebo comparison, ADHD symptom reduction, adverse effects, drug safety, pharmacotherapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Patient Dropouts, Research Design, Chi-Square Distribution, Odds Ratio, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Endpoint Determination, Dexmethylphenidate Hydrochloride

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review