Treatment discontinuation with methylphenidate in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Abstract
Background Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adulthood is increasingly diagnosed and treated. Methylphenidate is frequently advocated as a first-line pharmacological treatment. Purpose The aim of our study was to compare all-cause discontinuation rate of methylphenidate and its pharmaceutical presentations with placebo in adults with ADHD. Methods This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing methylphenidate with placebo in adults with ADHD. All-cause treatment discontinuation was the primary endpoint. The efficacy in reducing ADHD symptoms and safety were the secondary endpoints. Results Twelve studies (2,496 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Four racemic methylphenidate and one dexmethylphenidate presentations were investigated. The rate of all-cause treatment discontinuation was greater with methylphenidate than with placebo, but this difference was not statistically significant [odds ratio (OR) 1.19, 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 0.82-1.74, P = 0.37, I(2) = 64 %] This finding reached the conventional threshold of statistical significance after one outlier study was excluded (OR 1.44, 95 % CI 1.14-1.82, P = 0.002, I(2) = 0). Methylphenidate was more efficacious than placebo for reducing ADHD symptoms and it was associated with a higher proportion of patients dropping out due to adverse effects. Conclusions Despite reducing ADHD symptoms, methylphenidate showed no advantage over placebo in terms of treatme…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The acceptability of MPH treatment in adult ADHD was not greater than that of placebo (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.74).
“According to a recent meta-analysis, the acceptability of MPH treatment in adult ADHD was not greater than that of placebo (odds ratio [OR] 95% CI of 1.19 [0.82, 1.74]).37”
From Exploratory meta-analysis on lisdexamfetamine versus placebo in adult ADHD (2014) · cites this paper as [37]
The acceptability of OROS MPH in a recent review was worse than that of placebo.
“Unfortunately, the acceptability of OROS MPH in a recent review was worse than that of placebo.37”
From Exploratory meta-analysis on lisdexamfetamine versus placebo in adult ADHD (2014) · cites this paper as [37]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 54 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Castells, X., Cunill, R., & Capellà, D.
- Affiliations
- Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (ES)
- Universitat de Girona (ES)
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Published
- 2012-09-16
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 347-356
- ISSN
- 0031-6970 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1041
- OpenAlex
- W2028952686
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- adult ADHD, methylphenidate, treatment discontinuation, dexmethylphenidate, placebo comparison, ADHD symptom reduction, adverse effects, drug safety, pharmacotherapy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Patient Dropouts, Research Design, Chi-Square Distribution, Odds Ratio, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Endpoint Determination, Dexmethylphenidate Hydrochloride
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review