Statin-induced myopathy in a usual care setting—a prospective observational study of gender differences
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: The study aims to identify the occurrence and remission of statin-induced myopathy including patient perception and symptom characteristics with a gender perspective. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective, non-interventional investigation in 192 outpatients receiving statin treatment in usual care with 12 months follow-up. Main outcome measure was myopathy related to statin treatment and classified as probable using WHO criteria for adverse drug reaction (ADR) assessment. RESULTS: Fourteen percent developed myopathy, risk ratio for women 1.52 [95 % CI 1.37; 1.66] as compared to men. The majority graded their pain as "severe." CK values were within normal range. Eighty percent of the women compared to 43 % of the men reported that the muscular symptoms affected their daily life activities to a moderate or severe extent. For those who stopped treatment, mypopathy was the reason for 70 % of the women and 25 % of the men. There was a difference in mean dose between men with and without myopathy, but not in women. Among the patients with myopathy, 76 % reported other ADRs as compared to 21 % of the patients without myopathy (p = 0.002). Twenty-nine percent of the women and 18 % of the men reported other ADRs. CONCLUSION: Women reported a higher frequency of myopathy and other ADRs as well as a larger impact on daily life activities. In men, but not in women, the risk of myopathy was dose-dependent. Patients with myopathy were more susceptible to other statin-induced ADRs which raises the question about common underlying mechanisms.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The risk of developing myopathy is dose-dependent, and statin type predicts SAMS, with higher numbers of SAMS in patients administered lipophilic statins.
“Previous investigations show that the risk of developing myopathy is dose-dependent, and statin-type is a predictor for SAMS, with higher numbers of SAMS in patients administered to lipophilic statins.(10,44)”
From Effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on myopathy in statin-treated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [44]
The Discussion states that statin myopathy is considered dose-dependent, but the study found a significant dose difference only in men, not women; the Results report the corresponding doses. The Results also say all patients who developed myopathy had been prescribed simvastatin, but the paper does not establish that statin type predicts symptoms or that lipophilic statins produce more cases than other statins. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Skilving, I., Eriksson, M., Rane, A., & Ovesjö, M.-L.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Ovesjö, Marie-Louise
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Published
- 2016-08-02
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1171-1176
- ISSN
- 0031-6970 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1041
- PMC
- PMC5021730
- OpenAlex
- W2503616087
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Vetenskapsrådet (04496)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
- Keywords
- statin-induced myopathy, gender differences, adverse drug reactions, statins, myalgia, dose-dependent risk, usual care, creatine kinase, drug-induced myopathy
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscular Diseases, Primary Health Care, Sex Factors, Sweden, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review