Cited by 14Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model predictions of natural product-drug interactions between goldenseal, berberine, imatinib and bosutinib

Adiwidjaja, Jeffry, Boddy, Alan V., McLachlan, Andrew J.·2022·European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Purpose This study implements a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling approach to predict the effect of hydrastine and berberine, two major alkaloids present in goldenseal extract, on pharmacokinetics of imatinib and bosutinib.Methods PBPK models of hydrastine and berberine were developed in the Simcyp Simulator (version 17), integrating prior in vitro knowledge and published clinical pharmacokinetic data. The models account for reversible and irreversible (mechanism-based) inhibition of CYP3A enzymes as well as inhibition of the P-glycoprotein transporter. Inhibitory potencies of hydrastine and berberine on imatinib and bosutinib were estimated based on in vitro inhibition of metabolite formation.Results The PBPK models provided reliable estimates on the magnitude of interactions due to co-administration of goldenseal extract or high-dose berberine on substrates of CYP3A enzymes (midazolam, indinavir and cyclosporine) and P-glycoprotein (digoxin). PBPK simulations predicted a moderate twofold increase (5 th to 95 th percentiles of prediction of 1.4-3.1) in systemic exposure (AUC) of bosutinib when co-administered with clinically relevant doses of goldenseal extract. A high dose of berberine (300 mg thrice daily) was also expected to affect bosutinib exposure, albeit to a lesser extent than that predicted with goldenseal (AUC ratio of 1.3, 5 th to 95 th percentile: 1.1-1.6). Conversely, the corresponding effects on imatinib exposure are unlikely to be of clinical importance (predicted AUC ratios of 1.0-1.2).Conclusion PBPK model-based predictions highlighted potential clinically significant interactions between goldenseal extract and bosutinib, but not imatinib. Dose adjustment may need to be considered if co-administration is desirable. These findings should be confirmed with optimally designed controlled drug interaction studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00228-021-03266-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models predict increased exposure to CYP3A substrates such as imatinib in the presence of goldenseal alkaloids.

    “Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models also predict increased exposure to CYP3A substrates such as imatinib in the presence of goldenseal alkaloids [63].”
  • Controlled clinical pharmacokinetic studies in humans are lacking for the berberine-victim-drug pairs at the highest theoretical risk, such as tacrolimus, warfarin and QT-prolonging substrates.

    “Controlled clinical pharmacokinetic studies in humans are lacking for the berberine–victim-drug pairs at the highest theoretical risk, such as tacrolimus, warfarin and QT-prolonging substrates [39,63].”
  • The translational gap is constitutive of the field: in vitro concentrations that produce inhibition exceed human plasma concentrations by two to four orders of magnitude; local concentrations that would bridge the gap have been calculated but not measured in humans; PBPK models that would connect the two have not been validated against clinical data for berberine; and the human endpoints available

    “The in vitro concentrations that produce inhibition exceed human plasma concentrations by two to four orders of magnitude, as Section 2.1 sets out; the local concentrations that would bridge the gap have been calculated but not measured in humans; the PBPK models that would connect the two have not been validated against clinical data for berberine; and the human endpoints available are surrogates”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 14

Authors
Adiwidjaja, J., Boddy, A. V., & McLachlan, A. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Adiwidjaja, Jeffry
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2022-01-20
Volume
78
Issue
4
Pages
597-611
ISSN
  • 0031-6970 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1041
OpenAlex
W4205439663
Cited by
14
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
berberine, hydrastine, imatinib, bosutinib, drug-drug interactions, CYP3A inhibition, P-glycoprotein inhibition, mechanism-based inhibition, alkaloids, indinavir, cyclosporine, digoxin
MeSH terms
Imatinib Mesylate, Aniline Compounds, Berberine, Biological Products, Drug Interactions, Humans, Models, Biological, Nitriles, Quinolines, Hydrastis, Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review