The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure of Fully Hydrated Fluid Phase Lipid Bilayers with Monounsaturated Chains
Open accessAbstract
Quantitative structures are obtained at 30°C for the fully hydrated fluid phases of palmitoyloleoylphosphatidylcholine (POPC), with a double bond on the sn-2 hydrocarbon chain, and for dierucoylphosphatidylcholine (di22:1PC), with a double bond on each hydrocarbon chain. The form factors F(qz) for both lipids are obtained using a combination of three methods. (1) Volumetric measurements provide F(0). (2) X-ray scattering from extruded unilamellar vesicles provides ΙF(qz)Ι for low qz. (3) Diffuse X-ray scattering from oriented stacks of bilayers provides ΙF(qz)Ι for high qz. Also, data using method (2) are added to our recent data for dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DOPC) using methods (1) and (3); the new DOPC data agree very well with the recent data and with (4) our older data obtained using a liquid crystallographic X-ray method. We used hybrid electron density models to obtain structural results from these form factors. The result for area per lipid (A) for DOPC 72.4 ± 0.5 Å2 agrees well with our earlier publications, and we find A = 69.3 ± 0.5 Å2 for di22:1PC and A = 68.3 ± 1.5 Å2 for POPC. We obtain the values for five different average thicknesses: hydrophobic, steric, head-head, phosphate-phosphate and Luzzati. Comparison of the results for these three lipids and for our recent dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) determination provides quantitative measures of the effect of unsaturation on bilayer structure. Our results suggest that lipids with one monounsaturated chain have quantitative bilayer structures closer to lipids with two monounsaturated chains than to lipids with two completely saturated chains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydration forces between phospholipid bilayers
Rand, R. P., & Parsegian, V. A. (1989) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/0304-4157(89)90010-5 · Cited by 1,125
Nagle, J. F., Zhang, R., Tristram-Nagle, S., Sun, W., Petrache, H. I., & Suter, R. M. (1996) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79701-1 · Cited by 472
Self-citation
Cited by
Single-chain heteropolymers transport protons selectively and rapidly
Jiang, T., Hall, A., Eres, M., Hemmatian, Z., Qiao, B., Zhou, Y., Ruan, Z., Couse, A. D., Heller, W. T., Huang, H., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1881-0 · Cited by 122
Transmembrane proteins tetraspanin 4 and CD9 sense membrane curvature
Dharan, R., Goren, S., Cheppali, S. K., Shendrik, P., Brand, G., Vaknin, A., Yu, L., Kozlov, M. M., & Sorkin, R. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2208993119 · Cited by 70
Rossetti, P., Trollmann, M. F. W., Wichmann, C., Gutsmann, T., Eggeling, C., & Böckmann, R. A. (2026) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202411476 · Cited by 25
A Rigorous Framework for Calculating Protein–Protein Binding Affinities in Membranes
Blazhynska, M., Gumbart, J. C., Chen, H., Tajkhorshid, E., Roux, B., & Chipot, C. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00941 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Kučerka, N., Tristram-Nagle, S., & Nagle, J. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Membrane Biology
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 208
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 193-202
- ISSN
- 0022-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1424
- OpenAlex
- W2048623371
- Cited by
- 801
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.