Cited by 6Pituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsAdrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Does concomitant prolactin measurement ıncrease the accuracy of ınferior petrosal sinus sampling?

Apaydin, Tugce, Yasar, Mehmet, Baltacioglu, Feyyaz, Haklar, Goncagul, Gogas Yavuz, Dilek·2022·Neuroradiology

Abstract

Introduction Prolactin (PRL) measurement during inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) can be helpful to improve the accuracy. We aimed to evaluate the effect of measuring PRL levels as a predictor for the accuracy of IPSS and evaluate its impact on the lateralization of adenomas. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 51 patients who had undergone IPSS for the investigation of ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism. Results Forty-nine patients had proven Cushing's disease (CD), one had EAS, and the remaining one patient had adrenal adenoma. Forty-seven patients had an above 2 ACTH IPS/P ratio at baseline, and all the post-corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) ACTH IPS/P ratios of patients with proven CD were above 3. In these two patients whose ACTH IPS/P ratio at baseline was below 2, PRL IPS/P ratios were above 1.8 in only the dominant side, which was considered secondary to a prolactin intersinus gradient due to the biological effects of the tumor. PRL-adjusted ACTH IPS/P ratios were > 1.3 in all patients with proven CD; it was 0.7 in the patient with EAS. Surgically confirmed positive lateralization was observed in 55.1% of patients with the ACTH gradient, but when PRL-adjusted ACTH IPS/IPS ratios were used in addition to the ACTH gradient, the ratio increased to 67.3%. Conclusion Although PRL-adjusted ACTH IPS/P ratios can be helpful to improve the accuracy of results during IPSS procedures, a prolactin intersinus gradient towards the ACTH-dominant side in patients with CD may invalidate PRL as an indicator of pituitary venous outflow.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00234-021-02886-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prolactin-adjusted intersinus ACTH ratios can be used for tumor lateralization.

    “Studies have also shown how prolactin-adjusted intersinus ACTH ratios can be used for tumor lateralization (77, 79).”

    From Approach to the Patient: Diagnosis of Cushing Syndrome (2022) · cites this paper as [79]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 36 · Cited by 6

Authors
Apaydin, T., Yasar, M., Baltacioglu, F., Haklar, G., & Gogas Yavuz, D.
Affiliations
Marmara University (TR)
Venue
Neuroradiology
Published
2022-01-22
Volume
64
Issue
7
Pages
1411-1418
ISSN
  • 0028-3940 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1920
OpenAlex
W4226146897
Cited by
6
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroradiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
inferior petrosal sinus sampling, prolactin measurement, ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism, Cushing's disease, ectopic ACTH syndrome, adrenal adenoma
MeSH terms
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Humans, Pituitary Neoplasms, Prolactin, Retrospective Studies, Petrosal Sinus Sampling, Pituitary ACTH Hypersecretion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review