Cited by 99Origins and Evolution of LifeRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The Ribosome Challenge to the RNA World

Bowman, Jessica C., Hud, Nicholas V., Williams, Loren Dean·2015·Journal of Molecular Evolution

Abstract

An RNA World that predated the modern world of polypeptide and polynucleotide is one of the most widely accepted models in origin of life research. In this model, the translation system shepherded the RNA World into the extant biology of DNA, RNA, and protein. Here, we examine the RNA World Hypothesis in the context of increasingly detailed information available about the origins, evolution, functions, and mechanisms of the translation system. We conclude that the translation system presents critical challenges to RNA World Hypotheses. Firstly, a timeline of the RNA World is problematic when the ribosome is incorporated. The mechanism of peptidyl transfer of the ribosome appears distinct from evolved enzymes, signaling origins in a chemical rather than biological milieu. Secondly, we have no evidence that the basic biochemical toolset of life is subject to substantive change by Darwinian evolution, as required for the transition from the RNA world to extant biology. Thirdly, we do not see specific evidence for biological takeover of ribozyme function by protein enzymes. Finally, we can find no basis for preservation of the ribosome as ribozyme or the universality of translation, if it were the case that other information transducing ribozymes, such as ribozyme polymerases, were replaced by protein analogs and erased from the phylogenetic record. We suggest that an updated model of the RNA World should address the current state of knowledge of the translation system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00239-015-9669-9

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bowman, J. C., Hud, N. V., & Williams, L. D.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Loren Dean
Venue
Journal of Molecular Evolution
Published
2015-03-05
Volume
80
Issue
3-4
Pages
143-161
ISSN
  • 0022-2844 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1432
OpenAlex
W2012818031
Cited by
99
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
RNA world, origin of life, ribosome, translation systems, peptidyl transfer, ribozymes, Darwinian evolution, prebiotic chemistry
MeSH terms
Biopolymers, Escherichia coli, Phylogeny, Protein Conformation, Ribosomes, RNA, RNA, Messenger, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, RNA, Catalytic, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review