Rates of conservative and radical nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions in mammalian nuclear genes
Abstract
To understand the process and mechanism of protein evolution, it is important to know what types of amino acid substitutions are more likely to be under selection and what types are mostly neutral. An amino acid substitution can be classified as either conservative or radical, depending on whether it involves a change in a certain physicochemical property of the amino acid. Assuming Kimura's two-parameter model of nucleotide substitution, I present a method for computing the numbers of conservative and radical nonsynonymous (amino acid altering) nucleotide substitutions per site and estimate these rates for 47 nuclear genes from mammals. The results are as follows. (1) The average radical/conservative rate ratio is 0.81 for charge changes, 0.85 for polarity changes, and 0.49 when both polarity and volume changes are considered. (2) The radical/conservative rate ratio is positively correlated with the nonsynonymous/synonymous rate ratio for charge changes or when both polarity and volume changes are considered. (3) Both the conservative/synonymous rate ratio and the radical/synonymous rate ratio are lower in the rodent lineage than in the primate or artiodactyl lineage, suggesting more intense purifying selection in the rodent lineage, for both conservative and radical nonsynonymous substitutions. (4) Neglecting transition/transversion bias would cause an underestimation of both radical and conservative rates and the ratio thereof. (5) Transversions induce more dramatic geneti…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Each of the amino acid substitutions in positions 2, 3, and 8 in New World monkey OT ligands represents at least one physicochemical change from the corresponding residue in consensus mammalian OT, and hence these changes can be classified as 'radical' amino acid substitutions.
“Each of the amino acid substitutions in positions 2, 3, and 8 in NWM represents at least one physicochemical change (polarity, charge, or hydrophobicity) from the corresponding residue in consensus mammalian OT. Hence these changes can be classified as ‘radical’ amino acid substitutions (Zhang, 2000)”
From Neuropeptide diversity and the regulation of social behavior in New World primates (2016) · cites this paper as Zhang, 2000
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 356
- Authors
- Zhang, J.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Jianzhi
- ORCID
- Zhang, Jianzhi
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Evolution
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-68
- ISSN
- 0022-2844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121729179
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 7.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- nonsynonymous substitution rate, purifying selection, polarity change, volume change, transition-transversion bias, protein evolution
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acids, Animals, Artiodactyla, Mammals, Models, Genetic, Nuclear Proteins, Nucleotides, Primates, Rodentia, Genetic Variation, Amino Acid Substitution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review