Cited by 356Evolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Rates of conservative and radical nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions in mammalian nuclear genes

Zhang, Jianzhi·2000·Journal of Molecular Evolution

Abstract

To understand the process and mechanism of protein evolution, it is important to know what types of amino acid substitutions are more likely to be under selection and what types are mostly neutral. An amino acid substitution can be classified as either conservative or radical, depending on whether it involves a change in a certain physicochemical property of the amino acid. Assuming Kimura's two-parameter model of nucleotide substitution, I present a method for computing the numbers of conservative and radical nonsynonymous (amino acid altering) nucleotide substitutions per site and estimate these rates for 47 nuclear genes from mammals. The results are as follows. (1) The average radical/conservative rate ratio is 0.81 for charge changes, 0.85 for polarity changes, and 0.49 when both polarity and volume changes are considered. (2) The radical/conservative rate ratio is positively correlated with the nonsynonymous/synonymous rate ratio for charge changes or when both polarity and volume changes are considered. (3) Both the conservative/synonymous rate ratio and the radical/synonymous rate ratio are lower in the rodent lineage than in the primate or artiodactyl lineage, suggesting more intense purifying selection in the rodent lineage, for both conservative and radical nonsynonymous substitutions. (4) Neglecting transition/transversion bias would cause an underestimation of both radical and conservative rates and the ratio thereof. (5) Transversions induce more dramatic geneti…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002399910007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each of the amino acid substitutions in positions 2, 3, and 8 in New World monkey OT ligands represents at least one physicochemical change from the corresponding residue in consensus mammalian OT, and hence these changes can be classified as 'radical' amino acid substitutions.

    “Each of the amino acid substitutions in positions 2, 3, and 8 in NWM represents at least one physicochemical change (polarity, charge, or hydrophobicity) from the corresponding residue in consensus mammalian OT. Hence these changes can be classified as ‘radical’ amino acid substitutions (Zhang, 2000)”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 356

Authors
Zhang, J.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Jianzhi
Venue
Journal of Molecular Evolution
Published
2000-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
56-68
ISSN
0022-2844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121729179
Cited by
356
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
nonsynonymous substitution rate, purifying selection, polarity change, volume change, transition-transversion bias, protein evolution
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Animals, Artiodactyla, Mammals, Models, Genetic, Nuclear Proteins, Nucleotides, Primates, Rodentia, Genetic Variation, Amino Acid Substitution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review