Time- and dose-dependent effects of Roundup on human embryonic and placental cells
Abstract
Roundup is the major herbicide used worldwide, in particular on genetically modified plants that have been designed to tolerate it. We have tested the toxicity and endocrine disruption potential of Roundup (Bioforce on human embryonic 293 and placental-derived JEG3 cells, but also on normal human placenta and equine testis. The cell lines have proven to be suitable to estimate hormonal activity and toxicity of pollutants. The median lethal dose (LD(50)) of Roundup with embryonic cells is 0.3% within 1 h in serum-free medium, and it decreases to reach 0.06% (containing among other compounds 1.27 mM glyphosate) after 72 h in the presence of serum. In these conditions, the embryonic cells appear to be 2-4 times more sensitive than the placental ones. In all instances, Roundup (generally used in agriculture at 1-2%, i.e., with 21-42 mM glyphosate) is more efficient than its active ingredient, glyphosate, suggesting a synergistic effect provoked by the adjuvants present in Roundup. We demonstrated that serum-free cultures, even on a short-term basis (1 h), reveal the xenobiotic impacts that are visible 1-2 days later in serum. We also document at lower non-overtly toxic doses, from 0.01% (with 210 microM glyphosate) in 24 h, that Roundup is an aromatase disruptor. The direct inhibition is temperature-dependent and is confirmed in different tissues and species (cell lines from placenta or embryonic kidney, equine testicular, or human fresh placental extracts). Furthermore, glyphosate acts directly as a partial inactivator on microsomal aromatase, independently of its acidity, and in a dose-dependent manner. The cytotoxic, and potentially endocrine-disrupting effects of Roundup are thus amplified with time. Taken together, these data suggest that Roundup exposure may affect human reproduction and fetal development in case of contamination. Chemical mixtures in formulations appear to be underestimated regarding their toxic or hormonal impact.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ultrastructural findings are consistent with the well-documented toxic effect of very low dilutions of R on apoptosis, mitochondrial function, and cell membrane degradation inducing necrosis of hepatocytes and other cell lines.
“This is consistent with the well-documented toxic effect of very low dilutions of R on apoptosis, mitochondrial function, and cell membrane degradation inducing necrosis of hepatocytes, and other cell lines (Benachour and Seralini, 2009;Benachour et al., 2007;Gasnier et al., 2010;Peixoto, 2005).”
From RETRACTED: Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize (2012) · cites this paper as Benachour et al., 2007
This is consistent with the well-documented toxic effect of very low dilutions of R on apoptosis, mitochondrial function, and cell membrane degradation, inducing necrosis of hepatocytes, and in other cell lines.
“This is consistent with the well-documented toxic effect of very low dilutions of R on apoptosis, mitochondrial function, and cell membrane degradation, inducing necrosis of hepatocytes, and in other cell lines [8,9,44,45].”
From Republished study: long-term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerantgenetically modified maize (2014) · cites this paper as [44]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 226
- Authors
- Benachour, N., Sipahutar, H., Moslemi, S., Gasnier, C., Travert, C., & Séralini, G. E.
- Affiliations
- State University of Medan (ID)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie (FR)
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (FR)
- ORCID
- Sipahutar, H.
- Venue
- Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
- Published
- 2007-05-04
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 126-133
- ISSN
- 0090-4341 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0703
- OpenAlex
- W2096364120
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 10.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Région Normandie
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
- Keywords
- Roundup, glyphosate, herbicide toxicity, endocrine disruption, aromatase inhibition, placental cells, embryonic kidney cells, cytotoxicity, dose-dependent toxicity, time-dependent toxicity, equine testis, human reproduction, fetal development, chemical mixtures
- MeSH terms
- Glyphosate, Animals, Aromatase, Cell Line, Cell Survival, Glycine, Horses, Humans, Kidney, Male, Microsomes, Oxidoreductases, Placenta, Testis, Time Factors, Cell Line, Tumor, Aromatase Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review