Cited by 26Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Distribution, Toxic Potential, and Influence of Land Use on Conventional and Emerging Contaminants in Urban Stormwater Pond Sediments

Crane, Judy L.·2019·Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology

Abstract

This study examined the distribution and toxic potential of conventional and emerging contaminants in composite sediment samples from 15 stormwater ponds in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN metropolitan area. Previously, coal tar-based sealants were shown to be a major source of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to these ponds, and concentrations of carcinogenic benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) equivalents were influencing management options about pond maintenance. For the second component of this study, a complex mixture of 13 metal(loid)s, 4-nonylphenols, 8 brominated diphenyl ethers (BDEs), and total polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) were detected in all surficial samples. Contaminants with detection frequencies ≥ 20% included: silver (46.7%), beryllium (20.0%), chloride (60.0%), bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (60.0%), 10 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs; 26.7-80.0%), 4-nonylphenol monoethoxylate (66.7%), 4-nonylphenol diethoxylate (40.0%), bifenthrin (20.0%), total permethrins (33.3%), and 24 other BDE congener groups (20.0-93.3%). Five stormwater ponds had contaminants exceeding benchmarks likely to be associated with harmful effects to benthic organisms. Ponds with watersheds dominated by either commercial and/or industrial land uses had significantly higher (p < 0.05) concentrations of zinc, 4-nonylphenol, six BDEs (28 + 33, 47, 99, 100, 154, and 209), and total PBDEs than those dominated by residential land uses. Multivariate statistical analyses verified that updated B[a]P equivalents were an effective chemical proxy for making management decisions about excavated pond sediment. Jurisdictions that do not test their stormwater pond sediments prior to maintenance dredging should consider the environmental ramifications of applying this potentially contaminated material to land.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00244-019-00598-w

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 108 · Cited by 26

Authors
Crane, J. L.
Affiliations
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (US)
Corresponding author
Crane, Judy L.
Venue
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Published
2019-01-14
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
265-294
ISSN
  • 0090-4341 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0703
OpenAlex
W2909992520
Cited by
26
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Minnesota Legislature (House File 1231)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
urban stormwater, emerging contaminants, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, benzo[a]pyrene equivalent, metalloids, 4-nonylphenol, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, DEHP, PFAS, benthic toxicity, land use, dredging, sediment management, Minneapolis-St. Paul
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Metals, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Geologic Sediments, Halogenated Diphenyl Ethers, Ponds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review