Cited by 34Congenital Heart Disease StudiesNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyCardiovascular Conditions and Treatments

Multi-Tiered Analysis of Brain Injury in Neonates With Congenital Heart Disease

Open access
Mulkey, Sarah B., Swearingen, Christopher J., Melguizo, Maria S., Schmitz, Michael L., Ou, Xiawei, Ramakrishnaiah, Raghu H., Glasier, Charles M., Bradley Schaefer, G. +1 more·2013·Pediatric Cardiology

Abstract

Early brain injury occurs in newborns with congenital heart disease (CHD) placing them at risk for impaired neurodevelopmental outcomes. Predictors for preoperative brain injury have not been well described in CHD newborns. This study aimed to analyze, retrospectively, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a heterogeneous group of newborns who had CHD surgery during the first month of life using a detailed qualitative CHD MRI Injury Score, quantitative imaging assessments (regional apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] values and brain volumes), and clinical characteristics. Seventy-three newborns who had CHD surgery at 8 ± 5 (mean ± SD) days of life and preoperative brain MRI were included; 38 also had postoperative MRI. Thirty-four (34 of 73, 47 %) had at least one type of preoperative brain injury, and 28 of 38 (74 %) had postoperative brain injury. The 5-min APGAR score was negatively associated with preoperative injury, but there was no difference between CHD types. Infants with intraparenchymal hemorrhage, deep gray matter injury, and/or watershed infarcts had the highest CHD MRI Injury Scores. ADC values and brain volumes were not different in infants with different CHD types or in those with and without brain injury. In a mixed group of CHD newborns, brain injury was found preoperatively on MRI in almost 50 %, and there were no significant baseline characteristic differences to predict this early brain injury except 5-min APGAR score. We conclude that all infants, regardless of CHD type, who require early surgery should be evaluated with MRI because they are all at high risk for brain injury.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00246-013-0712-6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with single ventricle pathology have longer postoperative stay, more additional operations, and more frequent cardiopulmonary resuscitation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation than patients with transposition of the great arteries, but incidences of acquired brain injury are similar between the two groups.

    “Patients with SVP show longer length of postoperative stay, more additional operations, more often cardiopulmonary resuscitation and extracorporal membrane oxygenation than patients with TGA, 82 but incidences of acquired brain injury are similar between the two groups.59,83”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 34

Authors
Mulkey, S. B., Swearingen, C. J., Melguizo, M. S., Schmitz, M. L., Ou, X., Ramakrishnaiah, R. H., Glasier, C. M., Bradley Schaefer, G., & Bhutta, A. T.
Affiliations
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Mulkey, Sarah B.
Venue
Pediatric Cardiology
Published
2013-05-08
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
1772-1784
ISSN
  • 0172-0643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1971
OpenAlex
W2028238552
Cited by
34
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Arkansas
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Institute for Translational Neuroscience
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM103425, P30GM110702)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR029884)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
Keywords
congenital heart disease, neonatal brain injury, apparent diffusion coefficient, brain volume, Apgar score, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, watershed infarction, neurodevelopmental outcomes, neonatal cardiac surgery
MeSH terms
Arkansas, Brain, Brain Diseases, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Defects, Congenital, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review