Cited by 21Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCongenital Heart Disease StudiesHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

Accuracy of the Apple Watch Oxygen Saturation Measurement in Adults and Children with Congenital Heart Disease

Pätz, C., Michaelis, A., Markel, F., Löffelbein, F., Dähnert, I., Gebauer, R. A., Paech, C.·2023·Pediatric Cardiology

Abstract

As new customer health devices have been spread throughout the consumer market in recent years, it now needs to be evaluated if they also fulfill the requirements of clinical use. The Apple Watch Series 6 provides a new health feature with its oxygen saturation measurement. The aim of this prospective, investigator-initiated, single-arm study was to compare transcutaneous oxygen saturation measurements using the Apple Watch 6 with the conventional method of pulse oximetry in patients with congenital heart disease. Patients of any age presenting at the Leipzig Heart Center, Department for pediatric cardiology, were included. After obtaining informed consent, the routine oxygen saturation measurement with the pulse oximeter was taken and simultaneously three measurements with the Apple Watch. A total of 508 patients were enrolled. Comparing children and adults in terms of measurement success shows a statistically significant difference with a higher proportion of unsuccessful measurements in children, but no difference concerning correct versus incorrect Apple Watch measurements. Noticeable, strapping on the watch properly around the patient's wrists significantly improved the measurements compared to a watch only laid on. The study demonstrated that oxygen saturation measurement with the Apple Watch 6 is not yet up to the medical standard of pulse oximetry, too large a proportion of the measurements remain either unsuccessful or incorrect. While a high proportion of unsuccessf…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00246-022-02987-w

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The few existing studies do not investigate the effects of individual characteristics such as skin tone, compare across multiple devices, thoroughly examine performance in low ranges, or explore patterns of error and bias or missingness.

    “The few studies that do exist do not investigate the effects of individual characteristics (e.g., skin tone), compare across multiple devices or thoroughly examine performance in low ranges, or explore patterns of error and bias (e.g., consistent over- or underestimation of measurements) or missingness [10–13].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pätz, C., Michaelis, A., Markel, F., Löffelbein, F., Dähnert, I., Gebauer, R. A., & Paech, C.
Affiliations
Leipzig University (DE)
Corresponding author
Paech, C.
Venue
Pediatric Cardiology
Published
2022-08-22
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
333-343
ISSN
  • 0172-0643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1971
OpenAlex
W4292707182
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Keywords
transcutaneous oxygen saturation, pulse oximetry, congenital heart disease, wearable health devices, measurement accuracy, children, adults, motion artifacts
MeSH terms
Oxygen Saturation, Adult, Child, Heart Defects, Congenital, Humans, Oximetry, Oxygen, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review