Cited by 33Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionMicrobial metabolism and enzyme function

Amino acid and peptide utilization profiles of the fluoroacetate-degrading bacterium synergistetes strain MFA1 under varying conditions

Leong, Lex E. X., Denman, Stuart E., Hugenholtz, Philip, McSweeney, Christopher S.·2016·Microbial Ecology

Abstract

Synergistetes strain MFA1 is an asaccharolytic ruminal bacterium isolated based on its ability to degrade fluoroacetate, a plant toxin. The amino acid and peptide requirements of the bacterium were investigated under different culturing conditions. The growth of strain MFA1 and its fluoroacetate degradation rate were enhanced by peptide-rich protein hydrolysates (tryptone and yeast extract) compared to casamino acid, an amino acid-rich protein hydrolysate. Complete utilization and preference for arginine, asparagine, glutamate, glycine, and histidine as free amino acids from yeast extract were observed, while the utilization of serine, threonine, and lysine in free form and peptide-bound glutamate was stimulated during growth on fluoroacetate. A predominant peptide in yeast extract preferentially utilized by strain MFA1 was partially characterized by high-liquid performance chromatography-mass spectrometry as a hepta-glutamate oligopeptide. Similar utilization profiles of amino acids were observed between the co-culture of strain MFA1 with Methanobrevibacter smithii without fluoroacetate and pure strain MFA1 culture with fluoroacetate. This suggests that growth of strain MFA1 could be enhanced by a reduction of hydrogen partial pressure as a result of hydrogen removal by a methanogen or reduction of fluoroacetate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00248-015-0641-4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leong, L. E. X., Denman, S. E., Hugenholtz, P., & McSweeney, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
McSweeney, Christopher S.
Venue
Microbial Ecology
Published
2015-06-26
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
494-504
ISSN
  • 0095-3628 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-184X
OpenAlex
W745409710
Cited by
33
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Microbial Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
Keywords
rumen bacteria, amino acid utilization, peptide utilization, protein hydrolysates, yeast extract, tryptone, casamino acids, hydrogen partial pressure
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Bacteria, Biodegradation, Environmental, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Fluoroacetates, Peptides, Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review