Host Species and Environment Shape the Skin Microbiota of Mexican Axolotls
Open accessAbstract
Skin microbiomes in amphibians are complex systems that can be influenced by biotic and abiotic factors. In this study, we examined the effect of host species and environmental conditions on the skin bacterial and fungal microbiota of four obligate paedomorphic salamander species, commonly known as axolotls ( Ambystoma andersoni , A. dumerilii , A. mexicanum , and A. taylori ), all of them endemic to the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt . We found that despite their permanent aquatic lifestyle, these species present a host-specific skin microbiota that is distinct from aquatic communities. We identified skin-associated taxa that were unique to each host species and that differentiated axolotl species based on alpha and beta diversity metrics. Moreover, we identified a set of microbial taxa that were shared across hosts with high relative abundances across skin samples. Specifically, bacterial communities were dominated by Burkholderiales and Pseudomonadales bacterial orders and Capnodiales and Pleosporales fungal orders. Host species and environmental variables collectively explained more microbial composition variation in bacteria (R2 = 0.46) in comparison to fungi (R2 = 0.2). Our results contribute to a better understanding of the factors shaping the diversity and composition of skin microbial communities in Ambystoma . Additional studies are needed to disentangle the effects of specific host associated and environmental factors that could influence the skin microbiome of these endangered species.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- Soto-Cortés, E., Marroquín-Rodríguez, M., Basanta, M. D., Maldonado-López, Y., Parra-Olea, G., & Rebollar, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
- University of Nevada, Reno (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rebollar, Eria A.
- Venue
- Microbial Ecology
- Published
- 2024-07-24
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 98-98
- ISSN
- 0095-3628 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-184X
- OpenAlex
- W4400962418
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 2.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Microbial Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- CONAHCYT (CF-2019/373914)
- PAPIIT/UNAM (IN205521)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
- Keywords
- axolotl, Ambystoma, skin microbiome, amphibian skin microbiota, host species effects, environmental effects, bacterial communities, fungal communities, microbial diversity, Burkholderiales, Pseudomonadales, Capnodiales, Pleosporales, Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, threatened species
- MeSH terms
- Ambystoma mexicanum, Animals, Bacteria, Environment, Fungi, Mexico, Skin, Biodiversity, Host Specificity, Microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review