Myco-protein from Fusarium venenatum: A well-established product for human consumption
Abstract
Fusarium venenatum A3/5 was first chosen for development as a myco-protein in the late 1960s. It was intended as a protein source for humans and after 12 years of intensive testing, F. venenatum A3/5 was approved for sale as food by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in the United Kingdom in 1984. Today, myco-protein is produced in two 150,000 l pressure-cycle fermenters in a continuous process which outputs around 300 kg biomass/h. The continuous process is typically operated for around 1,000 h. One factor which has limited the length of production runs was the appearance of highly branched mutants in the population. Several factors affect the time of appearance of such mutants and a number of strategies for delaying their appearance have been investigated. After reduction of the RNA content, the fungal biomass is mixed with egg albumin and made into a variety of products. Consumption of these can lead to reduced blood cholesterol and to lower energy intake in a subsequent meal. E venenatum myco-protein is now used in products available in six European countries and there are plans for it to be sold in France, the United States and Germany.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A heat shock step degrades RNA in yeast.
“The use of a heat shock step in the degradation of RNA is also described by Wiebe (2002).”
From Brewer’s Spent Yeast (BSY), an Underutilized Brewing By-Product (2020) · cites this paper as Wiebe (2002)
A heat shock step degrades RNA in yeast.
“The use of a heat shock step in the degradation of RNA is also described by Wiebe (2002).”
From Brewer’s Spent Yeast (BSY), an Underutilized Brewing By-Product (2020) · cites this paper as [87]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 39 · Cited by 242
- Authors
- Wiebe, M.
- Affiliations
- Aalborg University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Wiebe, M.
- ORCID
- Wiebe, M.
- Venue
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 421-427
- ISSN
- 0175-7598 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0614
- OpenAlex
- W2045578397
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Advanced Scientific Research Methods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Fungal Biology and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
- Keywords
- Fusarium venenatum, continuous fermentation, ovalbumin, cholesterol lowering, energy intake
- MeSH terms
- Dietary Proteins, Fermentation, Food Handling, Fungal Proteins, Fusarium, Humans, Nutrition Assessment, Biomass
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review