Cited by 300Algal biology and biofuel productionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionLipid metabolism and biosynthesis

The effect of mixotrophy on microalgal growth, lipid content, and expression levels of three pathway genes in Chlorella sorokiniana

Wan, Minxi, Liu, Peng, Xia, Jinlan, Rosenberg, Julian N., Oyler, George A., Betenbaugh, Michael J., Nie, Zhenyuan, Qiu, Guanzhou·2011·Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract

Nannochloropsis oculata CCMP 525, Dunaliella salina FACHB 435, and Chlorella sorokiniana CCTCC M209220 were compared in mixotrophic and photoautotrophic cultures in terms of growth rate, protein, and lipid content. Growth improved in glucose, and the biomass productivities of N. oculata, D. salina, and C. sorokiniana were found to be 1.4-, 2.2- and 4.2-fold that observed photoautotrophically. However, biomass and lipid production decreased at the highest glucose concentrations. Meanwhile, the content of protein and lipid were significantly augmented for mixotrophic conditions at least for some species. C. sorokiniana was found to be well suited for lipid production based on its high biomass production rate and lipid content reaching 51% during mixotrophy. Expression levels of accD (heteromeric acetyl-CoA carboxylase beta subunit), acc1 (homomeric acetyl-CoA carboxylase), rbcL (ribulose 1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit) genes in C. sorokiniana were studied by real-time PCR. Increased expression levels of accD reflect the increased lipid content in stationary phase of mixotrophic growth, but expression of the acc1 gene remains low, suggesting that this gene may not be critical to lipid accumulation. Additionally, reduction of expression of the rbcL gene during mixotrophy indicated that utilization of glucose was found to reduce the role of this gene and photosynthesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00253-011-3399-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 300

Authors
Wan, M., Liu, P., Xia, J., Rosenberg, J. N., Oyler, G. A., Betenbaugh, M. J., Nie, Z., & Qiu, G.
Affiliations
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN)
Venue
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Published
2011-06-23
Volume
91
Issue
3
Pages
835-844
ISSN
  • 0175-7598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0614
OpenAlex
W1980793734
Cited by
300
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Keywords
mixotrophy, Chlorella sorokiniana, Nannochloropsis oculata, Dunaliella salina, microalgal lipid production, glucose supplementation, biomass productivity, protein content, acetyl-CoA carboxylase, photosynthesis, microalgae growth
MeSH terms
Acetyl Coenzyme A, Chlorella, Energy Metabolism, Lipids, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Biomass, Biofuels, Microalgae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review