Evaluation of the probiotic properties of new Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains and their in vitro effect
Open accessAbstract
Probiotic ingestion is recommended as a preventive approach to maintain the balance of the intestinal microbiota and to enhance the human well-being. During the whole life of each individual, the gut microbiota composition could be altered by lifestyle, diet, antibiotic therapies and other stress conditions, which may lead to acute and chronic disorders. Hence, probiotics can be administered for the prevention or treatment of some disorders, including lactose malabsorption, acute diarrhoea, irritable bowel syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis and mild forms of inflammatory bowel disease. The probiotic-mediated effect is an important issue that needs to be addressed in relation to strain-specific probiotic properties. In this work, the probiotic properties of new Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains were screened, and their effects in vitro were evaluated. They were screened for probiotic properties by determining their tolerance to low pH and to bile salts, antibiotic sensitivity, antimicrobial activity and vitamin B8, B9 and B12 production, and by considering their ability to increase the antioxidant potential and to modulate the inflammatory status of systemic-miming cell lines in vitro. Three out of the examined strains presenting the most performant probiotic properties, as Lactobacillus plantarum PBS067, Lactobacillus rhamnosus PBS070 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis PBSO75, were evaluated for their effects also on human intestinal HT-29 cell line. The obtained results support the possibility to move to another level of study, that is, the oral administration of these probiotical strains to patients with acute and chronic gut disorders, by in vivo experiments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 118
- Authors
- Presti, I., D’Orazio, G., Labra, M., La Ferla, B., Mezzasalma, V., Bizzaro, G., Giardina, S., Michelotti, A., Tursi, F., Vassallo, M., & Di Gennaro, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
- Fondazione Michelangelo (IT)
- Venue
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
- Published
- 2015-03-07
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5613-5626
- ISSN
- 0175-7598 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0614
- OpenAlex
- W2017855051
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 14.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Keywords
- probiotics, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, low pH tolerance, bile salt tolerance, antibiotic susceptibility, antimicrobial activity, vitamin B12 biosynthesis, antioxidant activity, inflammation modulation, HT-29 cells, gut microbiota
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antibiosis, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Antioxidants, Bifidobacterium, Bile Acids and Salts, Cell Line, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Epithelial Cells, Fibroblasts, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Lactobacillus, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Molecular Sequence Data, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Vitamin B Complex, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Probiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review