Cited by 61Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactantsMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyMicrobial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation

Microbial associations for bioremediation. What does “microbial consortia” mean?

Massot, Francisco, Bernard, Nathalie, Alvarez, Lucas M. Martinez, Martorell, María M., Mac Cormack, Walter P., Ruberto, Lucas A. M.·2022·Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract

Microbial associations arise as useful tools in several biotechnological processes. Among them, bioremediation of contaminated environments usually takes advantage of these microbial associations. Despite being frequently used, these associations are indicated using a variety of expressions, showing a lack of consensus by specialists in the field. The main idea of this work is to analyze the variety of microbial associations referred to as "microbial consortia" (MC) in the context of pollutants biodegradation and bioremediation. To do that, we summarize the origin of the term pointing out the features that an MC is expected to meet, according to the opinion of several authors. An analysis of related bibliography was done seeking criteria to rationalize and classify MC in the context of bioremediation. We identify that the microbe's origin and the level of human intervention are usually considered as a category to classify them as natural microbial consortia (NMC), artificial microbial consortia (AMC), and synthetic microbial consortia (SMC). In this sense, NMC are those associations composed by microorganisms obtained from a single source while AMC members come from different sources. SMC are a class of AMC in which microbial composition is defined to accomplish a certain specific task. We propose that the effective or potential existence of the interaction among MC members in the source material should be considered as a category in the classification as well, in combination…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00253-022-11864-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microbial consortia often involve multiple species working synergistically to degrade pollutants, but their interactions-including competition, cooperation, and signaling-must be carefully managed to maintain stability and efficiency.

    “Microbial consortia often involve multiple species working synergistically to degrade pollutants, but their interactions-including competition, cooperation, and signaling-must be carefully managed to maintain stability and efficiency [231].”

Authors
Massot, F., Bernard, N., Alvarez, L. M. M., Martorell, M. M., Mac Cormack, W. P., & Ruberto, L. A. M.
Affiliations
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Corresponding author
Ruberto, Lucas A. M.
Venue
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Published
2022-03-16
Volume
106
Issue
7
Pages
2283-2297
ISSN
  • 0175-7598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0614
OpenAlex
W4221003773
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Keywords
microbial consortia, bioremediation, microbial associations, synthetic microbial consortia, microbial interactions, pollutant biodegradation, terminology
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Biotechnology, Environmental Pollutants, Humans, Microbial Consortia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review