Cited by 0Meat and Animal Product QualityMuscle Physiology and DisordersViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects

Optimization of slaughter livestock serum as an alternative to fetal bovine serum in cultured meat application

Open access
Lee, Da-Young, Mariano, Ermie, Park, Ji Won, Namkung, Seok, Choi, So Young, Lee, Woo Jin, Shin, Ye Won, Bok, Chae Hyeon +1 more·2026·Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract

Abstract Fetal bovine serum (FBS) is widely used for cultured meat production, but its fetal origin raises ethical concerns and contributes to high cost and batch variability, driving the demand for practical alternatives. This study evaluated livestock sera from bovine, porcine, and chicken sources through biochemical profiling, proliferation and differentiation assays, and long-term serial passaging of bovine satellite cells. All sera met sterility requirements, although some livestock sera showed deviations in physicochemical parameters. Bovine and porcine sera, unlike chicken serum, consistently supported robust proliferation, myogenic differentiation, and long-term expansion. Importantly, the final FBS substitutes were optimized through supplementation with lipid-rich albumin or insulin–transferrin–selenium (25 µg/mL), which significantly enhanced cellular performance. Cost analysis revealed that replacing FBS with the optimized livestock-derived serum formulations reduced total medium cost by 62.6%. Collectively, optimized bovine- and porcine-based FBS substitutes represent effective, scalable, and ethically aligned alternatives for sustainable cultured meat bioprocessing. Key points • Bovine and porcine sera fully replaced FBS for bovine satellite cells • Optimized FBS substitutes supported stable proliferation during serial passaging • Replacing FBS reduced total culture medium cost by 62.6%

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00253-026-14017-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Lee, D.-Y., Mariano, E., Park, J. W., Namkung, S., Choi, S. Y., Lee, W. J., Shin, Y. W., Bok, C. H., & Hur, S. J.
Affiliations
Chung-Ang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Hur, Sun Jin
Venue
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Published
2026-09-02
ISSN
  • 0175-7598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0614
OpenAlex
W7206161456
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Chung-Ang University
  • Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Keywords
cultured meat, fetal bovine serum replacement, bovine satellite cells, myogenesis, cell proliferation, albumin supplementation, insulin-transferrin-selenium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review