Cited by 81Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

Prevalence of abnormal findings in 230 knees of asymptomatic adults using 3.0 T MRI

Open access
Horga, Laura M., Hirschmann, Anna C., Henckel, Johann, Fotiadou, Anastasia, Di Laura, Anna, Torlasco, Camilla, D’Silva, Andrew, Sharma, Sanjay +2 more·2020·Skeletal Radiology

Abstract

Objective: To identify abnormalities in asymptomatic sedentary individuals using 3.0 Tesla high-resolution MRI. Materials and methods: The cohort comprised of 230 knees of 115 uninjured sedentary adults (51 males, 64 females; median age: 44 years). All participants had bilateral knee 3.0 T MRIs. Two senior musculoskeletal radiologists graded all intraarticular knee structures using validated scoring systems. Participants completed Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaires at the time of the MRI scan. Results: MRI showed abnormalities in the majority (97%) of knees. Thirty percent knees had meniscal tears: horizontal (23%), complex (3%), vertical (2%), radial (2%) and bucket handle (1%). Cartilage and bone marrow abnormalities were prevalent at the patellofemoral joint (57% knees and 48% knees, respectively). Moderate and severe cartilage lesions were common, in 19% and 31% knees, respectively, while moderate and severe bone marrow oedema in 19% and 31% knees, respectively. Moderate-intensity lesion in tendons was found in 21% knees and high-grade tendonitis in 6% knees—the patellar (11% and 2%, respectively) and quadriceps (7% and 2%, respectively) tendons being most affected. Three percent partial ligamentous ruptures were found, especially of the anterior cruciate ligament (2%). Conclusion: Nearly all knees of asymptomatic adults showed abnormalities in at least one knee structure on MRI. Meniscal tears, cartilage and bone marrow lesions of the patellofemoral joint were the most common pathological findings. Bucket handle and complex meniscal tears were reported for the first time in asymptomatic knees.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00256-020-03394-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reproducibility of T2 mapping depends on standardizing acquisition parameters, fitting algorithms, and magnetic field strength.

    “reproducibility depends on standardizing acquisition parameters, fitting algorithms, and magnetic field strength [63,64,65].”

    From Biomarker-Guided Imaging and AI-Augmented Diagnosis of Degenerative Joint Disease (2025) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Introduction discusses how MRI field strength and sequences can affect diagnostic accuracy, and the Methods > MRI protocol specifies the study’s 3 T acquisition. Neither section addresses T2-mapping reproducibility or the need to standardize fitting algorithms. Searches for those terms and acquisition-parameter standardization found no passage supporting the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Correlations between imaging and biochemical markers such as CTX-II, COMP, and IL-1β confirm the potential of a multimodal assessment paradigm.

    “While correlations with biochemical markers (e.g., CTX-II, COMP, IL-1β) confirm the potential of a multimodal assessment paradigm”

    From Biomarker-Guided Imaging and AI-Augmented Diagnosis of Degenerative Joint Disease (2025) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Methods (Imaging analysis; page unavailable) describe MRI scoring, and the Results (Associations between lesions; page unavailable) report an association between two MRI findings. Searches for CTX-II, COMP, IL-1β and biochemical markers found no passage addressing correlations between imaging and biochemical markers or a multimodal assessment paradigm. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. [1]Culvenor AG, Øiestad BE, Hart HF, Stefanik JJ, Guermazi A, Crossley KM. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis features on magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic uninjured adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018. PMC6837253 29886437
  2. [2]Beattie KA Boullos P Pui M O’Neill J Inglis D Webber CE Abnormalities identified in the knees of asymptomatic volunteers using peripheral magnetic resonance imaging Osteoarthr Cartil 2005 13 3 181 186 15727883
  3. [3]Pappas GP Vogelsong MA Staroswiecki E Gold GE Safran MR Magnetic resonance imaging of asymptomatic knees in collegiate basketball players: the effect of one season of play Clin J Sport Med 2016 26 6 483 489 27347867 PMC5083196
  4. [4]Guymer E Baranyay F Wluka AE Hanna F Bell RJ Davis SR A study of the prevalence and associations of subchondral bone marrow lesions in the knees of healthy, middle-aged women Osteoarthr Cartil 2007 15 12 1437 1442 17560134
  5. [5]Wong S Steinbach L Zhao J Stehling C Ma CB Link TM Comparative study of imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T of the knee Skelet Radiol 2009 38 761 769 PMC2704948 19350234
  6. [6]Fischbach F Bruhn H Unterhauser F Ricke J Wieners G Felix R Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage defects at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of medium T2-weighted fast spin echo, T1-weighted two-dimensional and three-dimensional gradient echo pulse sequences Acta Radiol 2005 46 67 73 15841742
  7. [7]Crema MD Roemer FW Marra MD Burstein D Gold GE Eckstein F Articular cartilage in the knee: current MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research RadioGraphics. 2011 31 1 37 61 21257932 PMC6939857
  8. [8]Guermazi A Roemer FW Haugen IK Crema MD Hayashi D MRI-based semiquantitative scoring of joint pathology in osteoarthritis Nat Rev Rheumatol 2013 9 4 236 251 23321609
  9. [9]De Smet AA Mukherjee R Clinical, MRI, and arthroscopic findings associated with failure to diagnose a lateral meniscal tear on knee MRI Am J Roentgenol 2008 190 1 22 26 18094289
  10. [10]Huysse WCJ Verstraete KL Health technology assessment of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee Eur J Radiol 2008 65 2 190 193 18248929
  11. [11]Link TM Stahl R Woertler K Cartilage imaging: motivation, techniques, current and future significance Eur Radiol 2007 17 5 1135 1146 17093967
  12. [12]Craig JG Go L Blechinger J Hearshen D Bouffard JA Diamond M Three-tesla imaging of the knee: initial experience Skelet Radiol 2005 34 8 453 461 15968554
  13. [13]Vernickel P, Röschmann P, Findeklee C, Lüdeke KM, Leussler C, Overweg J, et al. Eight-channel transmit/receive body MRI coil at 3T. Magn Reson Med. 2007. 17654592
  14. [14]Mekle R Van Der Zwaag W Joosten A Gruetter R Comparison of three commercially available radio frequency coils for human brain imaging at 3 Tesla MAGMA 2008 21 1-2 53 61 18193311
  15. [15]Haskell WL Lee I-M Pate RR Powell KE Blair SN Franklin BA Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007 39 1423 1434 17762377
  16. [16]World Health Organization Global recommendations on physical activity for health 2010 Geneva World Heal Organ 26180873
  17. [17]Knight JA Physical inactivity: associated diseases and disorders Ann Clin Lab Sci 2012 42 3 320 337 22964623
  18. [18]Roos EM Lohmander LS The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003 1 64 14613558 PMC280702
  19. [19]Hunter DJ Lo GH Gale D Grainger AJ Guermazi A Conaghan PG The reliability of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI and the validity of bone marrow lesion assessment: BLOKS (Boston-Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score) Ann Rheum Dis 2008 67 206 211 17472995
  20. [20]Roemer FW Frobell R Lohmander LS Niu J Guermazi A Anterior Cruciate Ligament Osteoarthritis Score (ACLOAS): longitudinal MRI-based whole joint assessment of anterior cruciate ligament injury Osteoarthr Cartil 2014 22 668 682 24657830
  21. [21]Noyes FR Stabler CL A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy Am J Sports Med 1989 17 505 513 2675649
  22. [22]Gold GE Chen CA Koo S Hargreaves BA Bangerter NK Recent advances in MRI of articular cartilage Am J Roentgenol 2009 193 3 628 638 19696274 PMC2879429
  23. [23]Kornaat PR Ceulemans RYT Kroon HM Riyazi N Kloppenburg M Carter WO MRI assessment of knee osteoarthritis: Knee Osteoarthritis Scoring System (KOSS) - inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility of a compartment-based scoring system Skelet Radiol 2005 34 95 102 15480649
  24. [24]Johnson DP Wakeley CJ Watt I Magnetic resonance imaging of patellar tendonitis J Bone Jt Surg Ser B 1996 78 3 452 457 8636185
  25. [25]Peterfy CG Guermazi A Zaim S Tirman PFJ Miaux Y White D Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis Osteoarthr Cartil 2004 12 177 190 14972335
  26. [26]Hunter DJ Guermazi A Lo GH Grainger AJ Conaghan PG Boudreau RM Evolution of semi-quantitative whole joint assessment of knee OA: MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score) Osteoarthr Cartil 2011 19 990 1002 21645627 PMC4058435
  27. [27]Zanetti M Pfirrmann CWA Schmid MR Romero J Seifert B Hodler J Patients with suspected meniscal tears: prevalence of abnormalities seen on MRI of 100 symptomatic and 100 contralateral asymptomatic knees Am J Roentgenol 2003 181 3 635 641 12933452
  28. [28]Link Thomas Li Xiaojuan Bone Marrow Changes in Osteoarthritis Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology 2011 15 03 238 246 21644197
  29. [29]Sudoł-Szopińska I Kontny E Maśliński W Prochorec-Sobieszek M Warczyńska A Kwiatkowska B Significance of bone marrow edema in pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis Pol J Radiol 2013 78 57 63 23493495 PMC3596146
  30. [30]Li G Yin J Gao J Cheng TS Pavlos NJ Zhang C Subchondral bone in osteoarthritis: insight into risk factors and microstructural changes Arthritis Res Ther 2013 15 6 223 24321104 PMC4061721
  31. [31]Matiotti SB Soder RB Becker RG Santos FS Baldisserotto M MRI of the knees in asymptomatic adolescent soccer players: a case–control study J Magn Reson Imaging 2017 45 1 59 65 27251774
  32. [32]Cook JL Khan KM Kiss ZS Purdam CR Griffiths L Prospective imaging study of asymptomatic patellar tendinopathy in elite junior basketball players J Ultrasound Med 2000 19 7 473 479 10898301
  33. [33]Hagglund M Walden M Zwerver J Ekstrand J Epidemiology of patellar tendon injury in elite male soccer players Br J Sports Med 2011 39 9 1906 1911 21642599
  34. [34]Major NM Helms CA MR imaging of the knee: findings in asymptomatic collegiate basketball players Am J Roentgenol 2002 179 641 644 12185035
  35. [35]Abate M How obesity modifies tendons (implications for athletic activities) Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2014 4 3 298 302 25489546 PMC4241419
  36. [36]Frey C Zamora J The effects of obesity on orthopaedic foot and ankle pathology Foot Ankle Int 2007 28 9 996 999 17880874
  37. [37]Abate M Schiavone C Di Carlo L Salini V Achilles tendon and plantar fascia in recently diagnosed type II diabetes: role of body mass index Clin Rheumatol 2012 31 7 1109 1113 22349878
  38. [38]Malliaras P Cook JL Kent PM Anthropometric risk factors for patellar tendon injury among volleyball players Br J Sports Med 2007 41 4 259 263 16920767 PMC2658960
  39. [39]Klein EE Weil L Weil LS Fleischer AE Body mass index and Achilles tendonitis: a 10-year retrospective analysis Foot Ankle Spec 2013 6 4 276 282 23687343
  40. [40]Kornaat PR Reeder SB Koo S Brittain JH Yu H Andriacchi TP MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences Osteoarthr Cartil 2005 13 338 344 15780647
  41. [41]Stahl R Luke A Ma CB Krug R Steinbach L Majumdar S Prevalence of pathologic findings in asymptomatic knees of marathon runners before and after a competition in comparison with physically active subjects - a 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging study Skelet Radiol 2008 37 627 638 18463868
  42. [42]Calixto NE Kumar D Subburaj K Singh J Schooler J Nardo L Zonal differences in meniscus MR relaxation times in response to in vivo static loading in knee osteoarthritis J Orthop Res 2016 34 2 249 261 26223430 PMC6714045
  43. [43]Culvenor AG Collins NJ Guermazi A Cook JL Vicenzino B Khan KM Early knee osteoarthritis is evident one year following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a magnetic resonance imaging evaluation Arthritis Rheum 2015 67 4 946 955 25692959
  44. [44]Fleming BC Fadale PD Hulstyn MJ Shalvoy RM Oksendahl HL Badger GJ The effect of initial graft tension after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial with 36-month follow-up Am J Sports Med 2013 41 1 25 34 23144370 PMC3534813
  45. [45]Kaukinen P Podlipská J Guermazi A Niinimäki J Lehenkari P Roemer FW Associations between MRI-defined structural pathology and generalized and localized knee pain – the Oulu Knee Osteoarthritis study Osteoarthr Cartil 2016 24 9 1565 1576 27174007
  46. [46]Kumar D Subburaj K Lin W Karampinos DC McCulloch CE Li X Quadriceps and hamstrings morphology is related to walking mechanics and knee cartilage MRI relaxation times in young adults J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 2013 43 12 881 890 PMC4476495 24175607
  47. [47]Pan J Pialat J-B Joseph T Kuo D Joseph GB Nevitt MC Knee cartilage T2 characteristics and evolution in relation to morphologic abnormalities detected at 3-T MR imaging: a longitudinal study of the normal control cohort from the Osteoarthritis Initiative Radiology. 2011 261 2 507 515 21900614 PMC3198219
  48. [48]Sowers MF Karvonen-Gutierrez CA Jacobson JA Jiang Y Yosef M Associations of anatomical measures from MRI with radiographically defined knee osteoarthritis score, pain, and physical functioning J Bone Jt Surg Ser A 2011 93 3 241 251 PMC3028452 21266638
  49. [49]Sritanyaratana N Samsonov A Mossahebi P Wilson JJ Block WF Kijowski R Cross-relaxation imaging of human patellar cartilage in vivo at 3.0T Osteoarthr Cartil 2014 22 10 1568 1576 25278066 PMC4185154
  50. [50]Su F Hilton JF Nardo L Wu S Liang F Link TM Cartilage morphology and T1ρ and T2 quantification in ACL-reconstructed knees: a 2-year follow-up Osteoarthr Cartil 2013 21 8 1058 1067 23707754 PMC3752987
  51. [51]Van Der Heijden RA De Kanter JLM Bierma-Zeinstra SMA Verhaar JAN Van Veldhoven PLJ Krestin GP Structural abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with patellofemoral pain: a cross-sectional case-control study Am J Sports Med 2016 44 9 2339 2346 27206691
  52. [52]Thorlund JB Juhl CB Roos EM Lohmander LS Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits and harms BMJ. 2015 350 h2747 26080045 PMC4469973
  53. [53]Sihvonen R Paavola M Malmivaara A Itälä A Joukainen A Nurmi H Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus placebo surgery for a degenerative meniscus tear: a 2-year follow-up of the randomised controlled trial Ann Rheum Dis 2018 77 2 188 195 28522452 PMC5867417
  54. [54]Lanzer WL, Komenda G. Changes in articular cartilage after meniscectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;(252):41–8. 2406073
  55. [55]Song Y Greve JM Carter DR Giori NJ Meniscectomy alters the dynamic deformational behavior and cumulative strain of tibial articular cartilage in knee joints subjected to cyclic loads Osteoarthr Cartil 2008 16 12 1545 1554 18514552
  56. [56]Belo JN Berger MY Reijman M Koes BW Bierma-Zeinstra SMA Prognostic factors of progression of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of observational studies Arthritis Care Res 2007 57 1 13 26 17266080
  57. [57]Siddiqui MA Ahmad I Sabir AB Ullah E Rizvi SA Rizvi SW Clinical examination vs. MRI: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in detecting ACL and meniscal injuries in comparison to arthroscopy Polish Orthop Traumatol 2013 78 59 63 23416722
  58. [58]Brealey SD Influence of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee on GPs’ decisions: a randomised trial Br J Gen Pract 2007 57 541 622 629 17688756 PMC2099667

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horga, L. M., Hirschmann, A. C., Henckel, J., Fotiadou, A., Di Laura, A., Torlasco, C., D’Silva, A., Sharma, S., Moon, J. C., & Hart, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (GB)
  • University Hospital of Basel (CH)
  • University College London (GB)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Horga, Laura M.
Venue
Skeletal Radiology
Published
2020-02-14
Volume
49
Issue
7
Pages
1099-1107
ISSN
  • 0364-2348 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2161
OpenAlex
W3005820552
Cited by
81
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Skeletal Radiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
patient donations (patient donations)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
meniscal tears, bucket handle tear, patellofemoral joint, cartilage damage, bone marrow edema, patellar tendinopathy, quadriceps tendon, anterior cruciate ligament rupture, sedentary adults
MeSH terms
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Adult, Bone Marrow Diseases, Cartilage Diseases, Female, Humans, Knee Injuries, Knee Joint, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prevalence, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Tendinopathy, Sedentary Behavior, Asymptomatic Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review