The DOI matches its Crossref record.
FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this guideline is to provide a minimum standard for the acquisition and interpretation of PET and PET/CT scans with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). This guideline will therefore address general information about[18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) and is provided to help the physician and physicist to assist to carrying out,interpret, and document quantitative FDG PET/CT examinations,but will concentrate on the optimisation of diagnostic quality and quantitative information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zwanenburg, A., Vallières, M., Abdalah, M. A., Aerts, H. J. W. L., Andrearczyk, V., Apte, A., Ashrafinia, S., Bakas, S., Beukinga, R. J., Boellaard, R., et al. (2020) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2020191145 · Cited by 4,177
Self-citationFDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0
Boellaard, R., Delgado-Bolton, R., Oyen, W. J. G., Giammarile, F., Tatsch, K., Eschner, W., Verzijlbergen, F. J., Barrington, S. F., Pike, L. C., Weber, W. A., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x · Cited by 3,303
Self-citationRadiomics: the process and the challenges
Kumar, V., Gu, Y., Basu, S., Berglund, A., Eschrich, S. A., Schabath, M. B., Forster, K., Aerts, H. J. W. L., Dekker, A., Fenstermacher, D., et al. (2012) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.010 · Cited by 2,258
“Before a scanner is used in a quantitative manner, interinstitution cross-calibration and quality control such as proposed recently [14] are necessary (Fig.”
MethodKinahan, P. E., & Fletcher, J. W. (2010) · Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI · doi:10.1053/j.sult.2010.10.001 · Cited by 631
Performance Characteristics of the Digital Biograph Vision PET/CT System
van Sluis, J., de Jong, J., Schaar, J., Noordzij, W., van Snick, P., Dierckx, R., Borra, R., Willemsen, A., & Boellaard, R. (2019) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.215418 · Cited by 484
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Boellaard, R., O’Doherty, M. J., Weber, W. A., Mottaghy, F. M., Lonsdale, M. N., Stroobants, S. G., Oyen, W. J. G., Kotzerke, J., Hoekstra, O. S., Pruim, J., Marsden, P. K., Tatsch, K., Hoekstra, C. J., Visser, E. P., Arends, B., Verzijlbergen, F. J., Zijlstra, J. M., Comans, E. F. I., Lammertsma, A. A., Paans, A. M., Willemsen, A. T., Beyer, T., Bockisch, A., Schaefer-Prokop, C., Delbeke, D., Baum, R. P., Chiti, A., & Krause, B. J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
- Published
- 2009-11-14
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 181-200
- ISSN
- 1619-7070 (ISSN-L)
- 1619-7089
- OpenAlex
- W2145938281
- Cited by
- 1,326
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00259-009-1297-4
- The paper
- Boellaard, R., O’Doherty, M. J., Weber, W. A., Mottaghy, F. M., Lonsdale, M. N., Stroobants, S. G., Oyen, W. J. G., Kotzerke, J., Hoekstra, O. S., Pruim, J., Marsden, P. K., Tatsch, K., Hoekstra, C. J., Visser, E. P., Arends, B., Verzijlbergen, F. J., Zijlstra, J. M., Comans, E. F. I., Lammertsma, A. A., . . . Krause, B. J. (2010). FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1297-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
