Cited by 141Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Correlation of dose with toxicity and tumour response to 90Y- and 177Lu-PRRT provides the basis for optimization through individualized treatment planning.

Open access
Cremonesi, Marta, Ferrari, Mahila Esmeralda, Bodei, Lisa, Chiesa, Carlo, Sarnelli, Anna, Garibaldi, Cristina, Pacilio, Massimiliano, Strigari, Lidia +4 more·2018·European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Abstract

Purpose Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 90 Y-labelled and 177 Lu-labelled peptides is an effective strategy for the treatment of metastatic/nonresectable neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Dosimetry provides important information useful for optimizing PRRT with individualized regimens to reduce toxicity and increase tumour responses. However, this strategy is not applied in routine clinical practice, despite the fact that several dosimetric studies have demonstrated significant dose-effect correlations for normal organ toxicity and tumour response that can better guide therapy planning. The present study reviews the key relationships and the radiobiological models available in the literature with the aim of providing evidence that optimization of PRRT is feasible through the implementation of dosimetry.Methods The MEDLINE database was searched combining specific keywords. Original studies published in the English language reporting dose-effect outcomes in patients treated with PRRT were chosen.Results Nine of 126 studies were selected from PubMed, and a further five were added manually, reporting on 590 patients. The studies were analysed and are discussed in terms of weak and strong elements of correlations.Conclusion Several studies provided evidence of clinical benefit from the implementation of dosimetry in PRRT, indicating the potential contribution of this approach to reducing severe toxicity and/or reducing undertreatment that commonly occurs. Prospective trials, possibly multicentre, with larger numbers of patients undergoing quantitative dosimetry and with standardized methodologies should be carried out to definitively provide robust predictive paradigms to establish effective tailored PRRT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00259-018-4044-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 78 · Cited by 141

Authors
Cremonesi, M., Ferrari, M. E., Bodei, L., Chiesa, C., Sarnelli, A., Garibaldi, C., Pacilio, M., Strigari, L., Summers, P. E., Orecchia, R., Grana, C. M., & Botta, F.
Affiliations
  • European Institute of Oncology (IT)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT)
  • Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IT)
  • Policlinico Umberto I (IT)
  • Instituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena (IT)
Corresponding author
Grana, Chiara Maria
Venue
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Published
2018-05-21
Volume
45
Issue
13
Pages
2426-2441
ISSN
  • 1619-7070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1619-7089
OpenAlex
W2804721630
Cited by
141
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, yttrium-90, lutetium-177, dosimetry, dose-response relationship, tumor response, neuroendocrine tumors, personalized treatment planning, radiobiological models, undertreatment
MeSH terms
Humans, Lutetium, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Yttrium Radioisotopes, Receptors, Peptide, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review