How molecular imaging will enable robotic precision surgery: The role of artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and navigation
Open accessAbstract
Molecular imaging is one of the pillars of precision surgery. Its applications range from early diagnostics to therapy planning, execution, and the accurate assessment of outcomes. In particular, molecular imaging solutions are in high demand in minimally invasive surgical strategies, such as the substantially increasing field of robotic surgery. This review aims at connecting the molecular imaging and nuclear medicine community to the rapidly expanding armory of surgical medical devices. Such devices entail technologies ranging from artificial intelligence and computer-aided visualization technologies (software) to innovative molecular imaging modalities and surgical navigation (hardware). We discuss technologies based on their role at different steps of the surgical workflow, i.e., from surgical decision and planning, over to target localization and excision guidance, all the way to (back table) surgical verification. This provides a glimpse of how innovations from the technology fields can realize an exciting future for the molecular imaging and surgery communities.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many other domains of medicine beyond transplantation could benefit from AI, including precision medicine, AI-assisted computer vision, augmented and virtual reality, and AI-assisted integration and collection of patients' records.
“Moreover, while this manuscript focuses on the use of AI in transplantation, many other domains could benefit from it.”
From Artificial Intelligence: Present and Future Potential for Solid Organ Transplantation (2022) · cites this paper as [63]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 227 · Cited by 73
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [85]Bichlmeier C, Kipot M, Holdstock S, Heining SM, Euler E, Navab N. A Practical Approach for Intraoperative Contextual In-Situ Visualization. International Workshop on Augmented environments for Medical Imaging including Augmented Reality in Computer-aided Surgery (AMI-ARCS 2009). New York: MICCAI Society; 2009.
- [86]Kutter O, Aichert A, Bichlmeier C, Michael R, Ockert B, Euler E, Navab N. Real-time Volume Rendering for High Quality Visualization. in Augmented Reality. International Workshop on Augmented environments for Medical Imaging including Augmented Reality in Computer-aided Surgery (AMI-ARCS 2008; 2008.
- [159]Thompson W ArgÁez C Magnetic Localization System for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: A Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines, CADTH Rapid Response Reports 2020 Ottawa Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health 33074602
- [221]Herrmann K, Nieweg O E, Povoski S P (eds.) Radioguided Surgery: Current Applications and Innovative Directions in Clinical Practice; 2016. Springer International Publishing.
- Authors
- Wendler, T., van Leeuwen, F. W. B., Navab, N., & van Oosterom, M. N.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wendler, Thomas
- Venue
- European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
- Published
- 2021-06-29
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4201-4224
- ISSN
- 1619-7070 (ISSN-L)
- 1619-7089
- PMC
- PMC8566413
- OpenAlex
- W3176675455
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 227
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Technische Universität München
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
- Keywords
- molecular imaging, robotic surgery, precision surgery, minimally invasive surgery, surgical navigation, computer-aided visualization, artificial intelligence in surgery, surgical planning, target localization, surgical verification
- MeSH terms
- Augmented Reality, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Molecular Imaging, Robotic Surgical Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review