Cited by 32Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementVascular anomalies and interventions

Chronic mesenteric ischemia: efficacy and outcome of endovascular therapy

Loffroy, Romaric, Guiu, Boris, Cercueil, Jean-Pierre, Krausé, Denis·2010·Abdominal Imaging

Abstract

Chronic mesenteric ischemia is a rare condition caused by occlusive disease of the mesenteric vessels and manifested most commonly as abdominal pain. While the traditional therapy in symptomatic patients has been surgery, recent improvements in interventional devices and refinement in techniques have increased the popularity of endovascular treatment. The high procedural success and the low complication rate make the catheter-based approach an interesting alternative to surgery. Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting is now recognized as a minimally invasive means of obtaining good long-term results and is consequently suggested for the primary treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia. This article presents a review of the literature on indications and technical aspects of endovascular treatment, with emphasis on short- and long-term outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00261-009-9515-x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fluctuations in mortality among Hispanics, particularly the sharp decline in 2010 to 2013, can be due to the increasing success of highly efficacious endovascular treatments of vascular intestinal pathologies, such as percutaneous angioplasty and stenting.

    “The fluctuations in mortality among Hispanics, particularly the sharp decline in the years 2010 to 2013, can be due to the increasing success of highly efficacious endovascular treatments of vascular intestinal pathologies, such as percutaneous angioplasty and stenting [19].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loffroy, R., Guiu, B., Cercueil, J.-P., & Krausé, D.
Affiliations
Université de Bourgogne (FR)
Corresponding author
Loffroy, Romaric
Venue
Abdominal Imaging
Published
2009-04-16
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
306-314
ISSN
  • 0942-8925 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0509
OpenAlex
W2073198200
Cited by
32
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Abdominal Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
Keywords
chronic mesenteric ischemia, endovascular treatment, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, abdominal pain, surgical versus endovascular treatment, long-term outcomes, procedural complications
MeSH terms
Angioplasty, Balloon, Chronic Disease, Constriction, Pathologic, Humans, Ischemia, Mesenteric Arteries, Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion, Mesentery, Radiography, Thrombosis, Stents, Treatment Outcome, Mesenteric Artery, Superior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review