Cited by 11Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesBody Contouring and Surgery

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

Beitner, Melissa, Kurian, Marina S.·2012·Abdominal Radiology

Abstract

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is one of several weight loss procedures in the bariatric surgeon's armamentarium to treat morbid obesity. Laparoscopic gastric banding has the lowest perioperative risk compared to laparoscopic gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and duodenal switch (Buchwald et al., JAMA 292:1724-1737, 2004). The adjustable gastric band results in approximately 50% excess weight loss at 5 years (O'Brien and Dixon,J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13:265-270, 2003). In the long-term, reoperation rates can be high with the percentage of reoperations varying enormously in reported studies from 2% to 80% (Schouten et al., Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:99-109, 2011), although with changes in technique, reoperation rates after gastric banding have decreased (O'Brien et al., Obes Surg 15:820-826, 2005). Aftercare is critical to the success of the banded patient, in terms of adjusting the band as well as monitoring the patient's symptoms (Weichman et al., Surg Endosc 25:397-403, 2011). Several studies have shown that patients who are seen more than six to seven times in the first postoperative year have better weight loss.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00261-012-9864-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al (2004) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 292(14):1724–1737 · DOI · Paper page
  2. O’Brien PE, Dixon JB (2003) Lap-band: outcomes and results. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13(4):265–270 · DOI
  3. Schouten R, Japink D, Meesters B, Nelemans PJ, Greve JW (2011) Systematic literature review of reoperations after gastric banding: is a stepwise approach justified? Surg Obes Relat Dis 7(1):99–109 · DOI
  4. O’Brien PE, Dixon JB, Laurie C, Anderson M (2005) A prospective randomized trial of placement of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: comparison of the perigastric and pars flaccida pathways. Obes Surg 15(6):820–826 · DOI
  5. Weichman K, Ren C, Kurian M, et al (2011) The effectiveness of adjustable gastric banding: a retrospective 6-year U.S. follow-up study. Surg Endosc 25(2):397–403 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Beitner, M., & Kurian, M. S.
Affiliations
NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
Kurian, Marina S.
Venue
Abdominal Radiology
Published
2012-03-24
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
687-689
ISSN
  • 2366-004X (ISSN-L)
  • 2366-0058
OpenAlex
W1988116149
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Abdominal Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, morbid obesity, bariatric surgery, weight loss, excess weight loss, reoperation rate, postoperative follow-up, postoperative care
MeSH terms
Contrast Media, Humans, Obesity, Morbid, Laparoscopy, Postoperative Complications, Radiography, Abdominal, Gastroplasty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review