Variation in knee balance as a function of hip-knee-ankle angle and joint line obliquity in robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty
Abstract
Purpose To describe the mediolateral (ML) gap balance in pre-resection arthritic knees undergoing robot-assisted (RA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) within the nine phenotypes of the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification. Methods A total of 1124 RA TKA cases were retrospectively reviewed. ML balance was calculated using a digital ligament tensioning device following tibial resection and prior to any femoral resection throughout flexion (10°, 40°, and 90°). Lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were landmarked intra-operatively and adjusted for wear based on hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA). Knees were then subdivided into CPAK categories based on the arithmetic HKA (aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO). Differences in balance between CPAK phenotypes were compared. Results For aHKA, a greater medial gap was observed in varus compared to neutral or valgus knees at 10° (5.2 ± 3.0 mm vs 3.3 ± 3.2 mm vs - 0.4 ± 5.0 mm respectively; p Conclusion There is a high degree of variability in arthritic ML balance within and between each CPAK phenotype. A single alignment philosophy based on bony landmarks alone may not be sufficient to balance all knees. Utilisation of robotics and digital ligament tensioning devices serves as important adjuncts to characterize the patient-specific soft tissue profile.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It remains unknown if imageless intraoperative robotic data can accurately describe CPAK parameters.
“The ability of CT-based robotics to define constitutional alignment and CPAK has been established [16–18], yet it remains unknown if imageless intraoperative robotic data can accurately describe CPAK parameters [19–23].”
From Imageless robotic total knee arthroplasty determines similar coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) parameters to long leg radiographs (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Edelstein, A. I., Orsi, A. D., Plaskos, C., Coffey, S., & Suleiman, L. I. (2024) · Arthroplasty · doi:10.1186/s42836-024-00231-9 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Kim, R., Wakelin, E. A., Plaskos, C., Gupta, S., & Putman, S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Putman, Sophie
- Venue
- International Orthopaedics
- Published
- 2022-11-22
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 479-484
- ISSN
- 0341-2695 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-5195
- OpenAlex
- W4309745512
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Orthopaedics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
- Keywords
- total knee arthroplasty, robotic surgery, knee alignment, hip-knee-ankle angle, joint line obliquity, coronal plane alignment of the knee, lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, tibial resection, varus and valgus knee, osteoarthritis
- MeSH terms
- Ankle, Humans, Knee Joint, Retrospective Studies, Tibia, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Lower Extremity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review