Cited by 20Total Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Variation in knee balance as a function of hip-knee-ankle angle and joint line obliquity in robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty

Kim, Raymond, Wakelin, Edgar A., Plaskos, Christopher, Gupta, Sanjeev, Putman, Sophie·2023·International Orthopaedics

Abstract

Purpose To describe the mediolateral (ML) gap balance in pre-resection arthritic knees undergoing robot-assisted (RA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) within the nine phenotypes of the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification. Methods A total of 1124 RA TKA cases were retrospectively reviewed. ML balance was calculated using a digital ligament tensioning device following tibial resection and prior to any femoral resection throughout flexion (10°, 40°, and 90°). Lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were landmarked intra-operatively and adjusted for wear based on hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA). Knees were then subdivided into CPAK categories based on the arithmetic HKA (aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO). Differences in balance between CPAK phenotypes were compared. Results For aHKA, a greater medial gap was observed in varus compared to neutral or valgus knees at 10° (5.2 ± 3.0 mm vs 3.3 ± 3.2 mm vs - 0.4 ± 5.0 mm respectively; p Conclusion There is a high degree of variability in arthritic ML balance within and between each CPAK phenotype. A single alignment philosophy based on bony landmarks alone may not be sufficient to balance all knees. Utilisation of robotics and digital ligament tensioning devices serves as important adjuncts to characterize the patient-specific soft tissue profile.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00264-022-05636-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, R., Wakelin, E. A., Plaskos, C., Gupta, S., & Putman, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
Corresponding author
Putman, Sophie
Venue
International Orthopaedics
Published
2022-11-22
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
479-484
ISSN
  • 0341-2695 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-5195
OpenAlex
W4309745512
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Orthopaedics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
total knee arthroplasty, robotic surgery, knee alignment, hip-knee-ankle angle, joint line obliquity, coronal plane alignment of the knee, lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, tibial resection, varus and valgus knee, osteoarthritis
MeSH terms
Ankle, Humans, Knee Joint, Retrospective Studies, Tibia, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Lower Extremity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review