Cited by 42Dermatologic Treatments and ResearchFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesLaser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine

Clinical Outcomes and Complications Associated with Fractional Lasers: A Review of 730 Patients

Cohen, Steven R., Goodacre, Ashley, Lim, Soobin, Johnston, Jennifer, Henssler, Cory, Jeffers, Brian, Saad, Ahmad, Leong, Tracy·2017·Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Abstract

Background Fractional lasers were introduced to provide increased safety, while maintaining high efficacy and patient satisfaction. Patients with virtually all Fitzpatrick skin types could be safely treated using a wide spectrum of wavelengths and a broad array of skin conditions, and aging could be addressed. Although safety studies have been reported for ablative CO 2 and erbium lasers, surprisingly few data are available on adverse events and complications associated with fractional lasers. Objective We report the frequency of adverse events, skin improvement and complications in a broad range of skin types using a standardized protocol that can be safely tailored to the patient's presenting complaints by varying the laser wavelength and number of treatments. Materials and methods The medical records of 730 patients (>90% females, age ranged from 50.5. to 59.9 years.) who had been treated at FACES+ Aesthetic Facility were reviewed. Patients were followed from 1 to 10 months and were reviewed to determine the frequency of complications, as well as their frequency, type, cause, treatment and resolution thereof. Patients were categorized by Fitzpatrick skin type (I-IV) to determine whether skin type was related to the frequency of complications. Improvement in skin condition (wrinkles, nasolabial folds and pigment) was rated by a technician before and after treatment using a Likert scale, 0-5, with 0 being no change and 5 being the most improvement. Results Seven hundred thir…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00266-016-0767-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, S. R., Goodacre, A., Lim, S., Johnston, J., Henssler, C., Jeffers, B., Saad, A., & Leong, T.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Cohen, Steven R.
Venue
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Published
2016-12-28
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
171-178
ISSN
  • 0364-216X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-5241
OpenAlex
W2566868499
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
Keywords
fractional laser, laser complications, adverse events, Fitzpatrick skin type, skin aging, wrinkles, nasolabial fold, skin pigmentation, laser wavelength, treatment outcomes, downtime, patient satisfaction, cosmetic dermatology, laser safety, laser efficacy
MeSH terms
Cosmetic Techniques, Edema, Erythema, Esthetics, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Skin Aging, Databases, Factual, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Hyperpigmentation, Risk Assessment, Patient Selection, Low-Level Light Therapy, Lasers, Solid-State, Lasers, Gas

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review