Cited by 7Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Algorithm-Assisted Decision Making in Otoplasty

Abstract

Introduction Ear congenital deformities represent an aesthetical concern in adult patients and a social matter in children. An accurate assessment of ear defects should be made preoperatively in order to plan surgery adequately. Materials and methods In order to correctly assess the ear preoperatively the authors have considered four different subunits: helical and scaphal region (A), antihelical region (B), conchal region (C) and lobule region (D). Surgical planning should start from sub-unit A evaluation, ending with sub-unit D, in a concentric fashion. When sub-unit A defects have to be corrected, an anterior approach is preferred. Discussion A correct evaluation of ear defects prior to surgery is of dramatic importance. Sub-unit A ear defects are often disregarded, and surgical techniques for their correction are rarely considered. Correcting helical and scaphal defects requires an anterior approach, influencing the technique employed for the correction of subunits B and C defects. Sub-unit B defects should be evaluated and corrected before sub-unit C defects in order to avoid overcorrection of ear protrusion. Conclusion Several surgical techniques have been described in the literature for correcting ear defects. After many years of experience, we outlined a schematic flowchart that prevents from leaving areas of the ear untreated, providing the best possible result for the patient. Level of evidence iv This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00266-021-02368-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Siliprandi et al divided the ear into 4 surgical subunits-helical/scaphal, antihelical, conchal, and lobular-each requiring tailored strategies.

    “Siliprandi et al58 divided the ear into 4 surgical subunits—helical/scaphal, antihelical, conchal, and lobular—each requiring tailored strategies.”
  • A 21-year study of 274 cases validated the 4-subunit system, demonstrating high patient satisfaction and low complication rates.

    “A 21-year study of 274 cases validated this system, demonstrating high patient satisfaction and low complication rates.58”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 41 · Cited by 7

Authors
Siliprandi, M., Battistini, A., Agnelli, B., Bandi, V., Vinci, V., Lisa, A., Maione, L., & Siliprandi, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Humanitas University (IT)
Corresponding author
Siliprandi, Mattia
Venue
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Published
2021-06-08
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
207-219
ISSN
  • 0364-216X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-5241
OpenAlex
W3170758724
Cited by
7
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
otoplasty, ear deformity, preoperative assessment, surgical planning, ear lobule, anterior approach, congenital ear anomalies
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Child, Decision Making, Ear, External, Esthetics, Humans, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Ear Auricle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review