Tourist Perceptions of Degradation Caused by Coastal Nature-Based Recreation
Abstract
Tourist perceptions of environmental degradation caused by nature-based tourism activities in a coastal environment were determined in the Central Coast Region of Western Australia. Structured surveys were administered to 702 visitors over two peak seasons. Visitors were required to indicate their perceptions on a Likert-type scale. Activities assessed were swimming, boating, fishing, diving and snorkelling, (wind)surfing, sandboarding, four-wheel driving, (bush)walking, camping, horseriding and sightseeing. Tourists had significantly variable demographic characteristics over two seasons and participated in different activities. However, perception of environmental degradation of individual activities did not vary significantly between seasons, except for fishing, four-wheel driving and sandboarding. The age, origin and level of education of visitors had more effect on perceptions than gender or income group. Participation in an activity affected perceptions only for those who went fishing, sandboarding, four-wheel driving and sightseeing. Visitor perceptions were comparable to 'real' impacts documented in the recreation ecology literature. The results of this research indicate a need for improved visitor education and interpretation facilities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effects of coastal recreation may result directly from activities or indirectly from infrastructure construction and maintenance.
“These effects may result directly from activities (Priskin, 2003) or indirectly from infrastructure construction and maintenance (Nordstrom and Jackson, 2013).”
From Towards integrated management of sandy anthropogenic shores: Developing tools for the exploration of human-natural interactions (2025) · cites this paper as Priskin, 2003
Cites
Marine biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs
Roberts, C. M., McClean, C. J., Veron, J. E. N., Hawkins, J. P., Allen, G. R., McAllister, D. E., Mittermeier, C. G., Schueler, F. W., Spalding, M., Wells, F., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1067728 · Cited by 1,691 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bakhshianlamouki, E., Augustijn, E.-W., Brugnach, M., Voinov, A., & Wijnberg, K. (2025) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/adc353
- Authors
- Priskin, J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Priskin, Julianna
- ORCID
- Priskin, Julianna
- Venue
- Environmental Management
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-204
- ISSN
- 0364-152X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1009
- OpenAlex
- W1988578629
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
- Keywords
- tourist perceptions, environmental degradation, nature-based recreation, coastal tourism, recreation ecology, visitor demographics, seasonal variation, recreational activities, visitor education
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Australia, Conservation of Natural Resources, Data Collection, Environmental Pollutants, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Public Opinion, Recreation, Seasons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review