A Landscape Analysis of Cougar Distribution and Abundance in Montana, USA
Abstract
Recent growth in the distribution and abundance of cougars (Puma concolor) throughout western North America has created opportunities, challenges, and problems for wildlife managers and raises questions about what factors affect cougar populations. We present an analysis of factors thought to affect cougar distribution and abundance across the broad geographical scales on which most population management decisions are made. Our objectives were to: (1) identify and evaluate landscape parameters that can be used to predict the capability of habitats to support cougars, and (2) evaluate factors that may account for the recent expansion in cougar numbers. Habitat values based on terrain ruggedness and forested cover explained 73% of the variation in a cougar abundance index. Indices of cougar abundance also were spatially and temporally correlated with ungulate abundance. An increase in the number and total biomass of ungulate prey species is hypothesized to account for recent increases in cougars. Cougar populations in Montana are coping with land development by humans when other components of habitat and prey populations are sufficient. Our analysis provides a better understanding of what may have influenced recent growth in cougar distribution and abundance in Montana and, when combined with insights about stakeholder acceptance capacity, offers a basis for cougar management at broad scales. Long-term conservation of cougars necessitates a better understanding of ecosystem fun…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the western states, the distribution of cougars is influenced by the amount of topographic heterogeneity and the quantity of forested cover.
“In the western states, the distribution of cougars is influenced by the amount of topographic heterogeneity and the quantity of forested cover [37]”
From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [37]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Use of resource selection functions to identify conservation corridors
Chetkiewicz, C., & Boyce, M. (2009) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01686.x · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Genetic structure of mountain lion (Puma concolor) populations in California
Ernest, H., Boyce, W., Bleich, V., May, B., Stiver, S., & Torres, S. (2004) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1023/a:1024069014911 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
“In contrast, long distance movements (Pierce et al. 1999) and rapid expansion of range (Riley and Malecki 2001) should facilitate gene flow and reduce genetic substructure.”
BackgroundExtent and fragmentation of suitable leopard habitat in South Africa
Swanepoel, L., Lindsey, P. A., Somers, M. J., van Hoven, W., & Dalerum, F. (2013) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00566.x · Cited by 130 · see citing works
“The importance of surface ruggedness agrees with studies on cougars Puma concolor (Riley & Malecki, 2001), jaguars (Hatten et al., 2005) and leopards (Gavashelishvili & Lukarevskiy, 2008), which highlights the importance of rugged topography as suitable habitat.”
BackgroundHabitat variables associated with wolf (Canis lupus) distribution and abundance in northern Poland
Jędrzejewski, W., Niedziałkowska, M., Nowak, S., & Jȩdrzejewska, B. (2004) · doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00073.x · Cited by 123
Estimating abundance of mountain lions from unstructured spatial sampling
Russell, R., Royle, J. A., Desimone, R., Schwartz, M. K., Edwards, V. L., Pilgrim, K. P., & McKelvey, K. (2012) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1002/jwmg.412 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
“Statewide, annual mortality estimates from hunting, vehicle collisions, animal damage control, and natural causes increased from 68 in 1981 to 617 in 1994 indicating likely increases in mountain lion abundance during this time (Riley and Malecki 2001).”
BackgroundCougar Population Dynamics and Viability in the Pacific Northwest
Lambert, C., Wielgus, R., Robinson, H. S., Katnik, D. D., Cruickshank, H., Clarke, R., & Almack, J. (2006) · doi:10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[246:cpdavi]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 113
Bouchet, P. J., Meeuwig, J. J., Kent, C. S., Letessier, T. B., & Jenner, C. (2014) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.12130 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Microhabitat selection by Eurasian lynx and its implications for species conservation
Podgórski, T., Schmidt, K., Kowalczyk, R., & Gulczyńska, A. (2008) · ACTA THERIOLOGICA · doi:10.1007/bf03194243 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
“large-scale assessments of habitat availability have been proposed for a number of species in order to identify their potential to persist or recover (Beier 1993, Smith et al. 1998, Riley and Malecki 2001, Woolf et al. 2002, Kramer-Schadt et al. 2004, Hoving et al. 2005).”
BackgroundWittmer, H., Ahrens, R., & Mclellan, B. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.007 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“Mountain caribou are the southernmost remaining caribou in North America and are found only in mountainous ecosystems of southeastern British Columbia, Canada, and extreme northern Idaho, United States.”
BackgroundInfluentialSpatial risk assessment of livestock exposure to pumas in Patagonia, Argentina
Kissling, W., Fernández, N., & Paruelo, J. (2009) · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05781.x · Cited by 53
“The altitudinal range of the paddock reflects the spatial heterogeneity of the landscape and its relevance for puma is explained by a higher availability of refuge areas (Riley and Malecki 2001).”
Dynamics of early wolf and cougar eradication efforts in Montana: implications for conservation
Riley, S., Nesslage, G. M., & Maurer, B. (2004) · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.019 · Cited by 53
“Cougars are capable of exploiting valley and foothill habitats because of relatively new, abundant white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) populations (Riley and Malecki, 2001).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBalkenhol, N., Holbrook, J. D., Onorato, D. P., Zager, P., White, C., & Waits, L. (2014) · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00462.x · Cited by 50
Janecka, J., Tewes, M., Laack, L. L., Caso, A., Grassman, L., Haines, A., Shindle, D., Davis, B., Murphy, W. J., & Honeycutt, R. (2011) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2011.00475.x · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“In North America, species such as the mountain lion Puma concolor have begun to recover, and others including the bobcat Lynx rufus remain abundant even in areas with high human densities (Nielsen & Wolf, 2001; Riley & Malecki, 2001; Pimm, Dollar & Bass, 2006; Ruell et al., 2009).”
BackgroundEacker, D., Lukacs, P., Proffitt, K., & Hebblewhite, M. (2017) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.1521 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“Introduction To efficiently respond to changing conditions that may alter population dynamics such as carnivore recovery (Pletscher et al. 1997, Riley and Malecki 2001, Kendall et al. 2009), climate change (Gaillard et al. 2013, Zimova et al. 2014), or habitat degradation (DeCesare et al. 2012),…”
BackgroundAlexander, S., Logan, T., & Paquet, P. (2006) · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01564.x · Cited by 45
“The response to elevation may have stemmed from the cougars’ adaptations for movement in rugged mountainous terrain (Riley & Malecki, 2001) and access to alternative prey.”
BackgroundEvaluation of Factors Potentially Influencing a Desert Bighorn Sheep Population
Mckinney, T., Smith, T. W., & Devos, J. C. (2006) · Wildlife Monographs · doi:10.2193/0084-0173(2006)164[1:eofpia]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“Mountain lions may select steep, rugged topography (Logan and Irwin 1985, Riley and Malecki 2001) but while hunting or traveling also may use terrain less rugged than general surroundings (Dickson et al. 2005).”
BackgroundAnnual elk calf survival in a multiple carnivore system
Eacker, D., Hebblewhite, M., Proffitt, K., Jimenez, B., Mitchell, M. S., & Robinson, H. S. (2016) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1002/jwmg.21133 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Guerisoli, M. D. L. M., Caruso, N., Vidal, E. L., & Lucherini, M. (2019) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyz005 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Mosaics of Exotic Forest Plantations and Native Forests as Habitat of Pumas
Mazzolli, M. (2010) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9528-9 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“Due to the large habitat requirements (food and space) of top carnivores (Eisenberg 1980; Mac Nab 1963; Robinson and Redford 1986), the identification of factors that define and limit carnivore distribution and abundance are a current topic in ecology (e.g., Beier 1995; Carroll and others 2000; Comiskey and others 200…”
BackgroundCurt, T., Borgniet, L., Ibanez, T., Moron, V., & Hély, C. (2015) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.032 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Landscape genetics of mountain lions (Puma concolor) in southern Brazil
de Castilho, C. S., Marins-Sá, L. G., Benedet, R. C., & de Freitas, T. R. D. (2011) · doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2010.08.002 · Cited by 36
Fine scale population genetic structure of pumas in the Intermountain West
Loxterman, J. L. (2011) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-011-0208-y · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Nevertheless, some populations still occur at moderate population densities in relatively non-fragmented habitat (Seidensticker et al. 1973; Riley and Malecki 2001) and due to their ability to disperse distances greater than 400 km (Logan and Sweanor 2000, 2001; Thompson and Jenks 2005), pumas are…”
BackgroundScavenging Makes Cougars Susceptible to Snaring at Wolf Bait Stations
Knopff, K., Knopff, A. A., & Boyce, M. (2010) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/2009-252 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Cougar population status and range expansion in Alberta during 1991–2010
Knopff, K., Webb, N., & Boyce, M. (2014) · doi:10.1002/wsb.369 · Cited by 31
Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat
Frakes, R. A., Belden, R. C., Wood, B. E., & James, F. E. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133044 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“In the western states, the distribution of cougars is influenced by the amount of topographic heterogeneity and the quantity of forested cover [37], and in south Florida forested habitats have been shown to be important to panthers [4–9, 38], although it is topographically flat [39].”
BackgroundPía, M. V., Renison, D., Mangeaud, A., de Angelo, C., & Haro, J. G. (2013) · Journal of Arid Environments · doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.11.004 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Mountain lion habitat selection in Arizona
Nicholson, K. L., Krausman, P., Smith, T. W., Ballard, W., & Mckinney, T. (2014) · The Southwestern Naturalist · doi:10.1894/tal-62.1 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Spatial and temporal interactions of sympatric mountain lions in Arizona
Nicholson, K. L., Krausman, P., Munguía-Vega, A., & Culver, M. (2011) · Zeitschrift f\ ur Jagdwissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s10344-011-0528-8 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Mountain lions select for forested and woody cover with aversion to flat open areas (Logan and Irwin 1985; Koehler and Hornocker 1991; Riley and Malecki 2001; McRae et al. 2005; Nicholson 2009).”
BackgroundAlexander, S. (2008) · Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.2008.00207.x · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Mammal use of riparian corridors in semi‐arid Sonora, Mexico
Ragan, K., Schipper, J., Bateman, H., & Hall, S. (2022) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1002/jwmg.22322 · Cited by 11
Potential cougar habitats and dispersal corridors in Eastern North America
Winkel, B., Nielsen, C., Hillard, E. M., Sutherland, R., & LaRue, M. (2022) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-022-01538-1 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Abundant prey availability in eastern North America may limit cougar density, but not restrict cougar recolonization of the region (Riley and Malecki 2001; Cooley et al.”
BackgroundDen selection by barren-ground grizzly bears, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories
Smereka, C. A., Edwards, M., Pongracz, J., Branigan, M., Pilfold, N. W., & Derocher, A. (2017) · Polar Biology · doi:10.1007/s00300-016-1974-2 · Cited by 10
“…systematic searches along transect lines, aerial searches of areas designated for industrial activity, backtracking bears in the snow, tracking radio-collared bears to their dens, searching randomized grids, and opportunistically while conducting ecological studies on grizzly bears and…”
BackgroundMethodRuiz-García, M., Pacheco, L. F. R., & Álvarez, D. (2009) · doi:10.4067/s0716-078x2009000100007 · Cited by 10
“…parecen seguir una estructura metapoblacional (Beier 1996, Sweanor et al. 2000), pero en otras zonas los animales muestran desplazamientos extremadamente largos (Pierce et al. 1999) o rápidas expansiones poblacionales (Riley & Malecki 2001), lo que, indudablemente, facilita un elevado flujo génico.”
BackgroundJensen, R., Ruprecht, J. S., Orning, E., Levi, T., Clark, D. E., & Forrester, T. D. (2024) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyae045 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Felids may prefer more rugged terrain because their ambush style of hunting is facilitated by features such as rocks, steeper slopes, and thicker vegetation (Logan and Irwin 1985; Riley and Malecki 2001; Rieth 2010).”
Rates of Survival and Sources of Mortality of Cougars in Hunted Populations in North-central Arizona
Mckinney, T., Smith, T. W., & Waddell, R. B. (2009) · doi:10.1894/clg-14.1 · Cited by 8
Reding, D. M. (2011) · doi:10.31274/etd-180810-2298 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“…America, bobcats (Lynx rufus) (Tucker et al. 2008), gray wolves (Canis lupus) (Fuller et al. 1992), brown bears (Ursus arctos) (Pyare et al. 2004), and cougars (Puma concolor) (Riley & Malecki 2001) have experienced recent range expansions, partly due to improved protection and habitat management.”
BackgroundChanchani, P., Noon, B., Bista, A., Warrier, R., Nair, S., Sharma, R., Gupta, M., & Gerber, B. (2024) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2024.1209309 · Cited by 3
Pant, B., Hunt, K., & Bhattarai, S. (2026) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871209.2026.2704924
- Authors
- Riley, S. J., & Malecki, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- ORCID
- Riley, Shawn J.
- Venue
- Environmental Management
- Published
- 2001-04-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 317-323
- ISSN
- 0364-152X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1009
- OpenAlex
- W2055815412
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
- Keywords
- Puma concolor, habitat suitability, landscape parameters, terrain ruggedness, forest cover, prey biomass, population growth, wildlife management, conservation, Montana
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animals, Wild, Carnivora, Conservation of Natural Resources, Decision Making, Environmental Monitoring, Female, Male, Population Dynamics, Predatory Behavior, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review