Use of Ammophila arenaria for Dune Stabilization in South Africa and Its Current DistributionPerceptions and Problems
Abstract
/ This paper examines the use of the European dune pioneer plant Ammophila arenaria (marram or European beach grass) for dune stabilization in South Africa in the past and present, its present distribution in South Africa, and the perceptions of coastal management agencies and the public about its further use. The planting of A. arenaria became the most important means of dune stabilization, by human intervention, along the South African Cape coast in this century. Its modern distribution from the semiarid west coast to the subtropical shores of the Eastern Cape extends through various climatic zones. Although historical data are missing for some areas, there is no indication of its unaided spread. A. arenaria occurs at most sites because of its prior planting. The South African climate appears to affect its vigor. However, concern about the use of the alien grass has been raised since it has proved to be a highly invasive species in other parts of the world, particularly along the North American west coast and in Tasmania. While the CSIR (Council of Scientific and Industrial Research) promotes its use, CNC (Cape Nature Conservation) follows a policy that restricts the use of any alien plant, including A. arenaria, and requests further research on its invasive properties. Although a questionnaire survey shows that stabilization sites featuring large areas of A. arenaria are accepted by the South African public, current coastal management practices need to be analyzed critically. A thorough investigation of the potential invasiveness of A. arenaria on South African coastal dunes will be essential and shed new light on the American A. arenaria problem.KEY WORDS: Ammophila arenaria; Marram; European beach grass; Dune stabilization; South Africa; Coastal managementhttp://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/00267/bibs/24n4p467.html</HEA
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In South Africa, historical planting practices to stabilize mobile sand demonstrate how remnant nature can serve as a critical enabling force for multiple benefits.
“In South Africa, historical planting practices to stabilize mobile sand—whether by public agencies or private individuals—demonstrate how remnant nature can serve as a critical enabling force for multiple benefits (88).”
From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [88]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- M. Hertling, R. A. L.
- Venue
- Environmental Management
- Published
- 1999-11-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 467-482
- ISSN
- 0364-152X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1009
- OpenAlex
- W2168716701
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Aeolian processes and effects
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
- Keywords
- Ammophila arenaria, marram grass, dune stabilization, coastal dunes, invasive alien plants, public perception, coastal zone management, plant distribution, biological invasiveness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review