The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Surgery on the Outcome of Midgut Carcinoid Disease with Lymph Node and Liver Metastases
Abstract
We have evaluated survival and tumor‐related symptoms in the presence of mesenteric lymph node and liver metastases in relation to surgical procedures in 314 patients (148 women, mean age at diagnosis 61 years; 249 with liver metastases) treated for midgut carcinoid tumors. Of the operated patients, 46% presented with severe abdominal pain and intestinal obstruction and were operated on before the diagnosis. Medical treatment (somatostatin analogs, interferon‐a) was initiated in 67% and 86%, respectively. Surgical attempts included small intestine or ileocecal/right‐sided colon resection with excision of mesenteric lymph node metastases. Most of the patients (n = 286) had mesenteric lymph node metastases; 33% of them had unresectable mesenteric lymph node metastases and underwent surgery without mesenteric dissection. Patients who underwent resection for the primary tumor had a longer survival than those with no resection (median survival 7.4 vs. 4.0 years; p <0.01). Patients who underwent successful excision of mesenteric metastases had a significantly longer survival than those with remaining lymph node metastases. Patients operated on for a primary tumor but with remaining lymph nodes but no liver metastases and who subsequently received interferon and somatostatin analog treatment had a median survival of 7.4 years. Resection of the primary tumor and the mesenteric lymph node metastases led to a significant reduction in tumor‐related symptoms. Surgery to remove the primary intestinal tumor including mesenteric lymph node metastases is supported by the present results, even in the presence of liver metastases. Liver metastases and significant preoperative weight loss are identified as major negative prognostic factors for survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Current Status of Gastrointestinal Carcinoids
Modlin, I. M., Kidd, M., Latich, I., Zikusoka, M. N., & Shapiro, M. D. (2005) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.038 · Cited by 848
The diagnosis and medical management of advanced neuroendocrine tumors.
Kaltsas, G. A., Besser, G. M., & Grossman, A. B. (2004) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2003-0014 · Cited by 674
ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Jejunum and Ileum
Niederle, B., Pape, U.-F., Costa, F., Gross, D., Kelestimur, F., Knigge, U., Öberg, K., Pavel, M., Perren, A., Toumpanakis, C., et al. (2016) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000443170 · Cited by 474
Self-citationPape, U.-F., Perren, A., Niederle, B., Gross, D., Gress, T., Costa, F., Arnold, R., Denecke, T., Plöckinger, U., Salazar, R., et al. (2012) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000335629 · Cited by 465
Prognostic factors of long-term outcome in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours
Pape, U.-F., Berndt, U., Muller-Nordhorn, J., Bohmig, M., Roll, S., Koch, M., Willich, S. N., & Wiedenmann, B. (2008) · Endocrine Related Cancer · doi:10.1677/erc-08-0017 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Hellman, P., Lundström, T., Öhrvall, U., Eriksson, B., Skogseid, B., Öberg, K., Tiensuu Janson, E., & Åkerström, G.
- Venue
- World Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 991-997
- ISSN
- 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2323
- OpenAlex
- W2048195661
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Surgery on the Outcome of Midgut Carcinoid Disease with Lymph Node and Liver Metastases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00268-002-6630-z
- The paper
- Hellman, P., Lundström, T., Öhrvall, U., Eriksson, B., Skogseid, B., Öberg, K., Tiensuu Janson, E., & Åkerström, G. (2002). Effect of Surgery on the Outcome of Midgut Carcinoid Disease with Lymph Node and Liver Metastases. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-002-6630-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.