Cited by 62Pancreatic function and diabetesNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesDiabetes and associated disorders

Nesidioblastosis: An Old Term and a New Understanding

Kaczirek, Klaus, Niederle, Bruno·2004·World Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Nesidioblastosis is a clinically, pathologically, and genetically heterogeneous disease. Differences between well described forms in neonates with persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy (PHHI) and rare forms in adults are described. Histopathologic criteria include hypertrophic islets occasionally showing beta cells with pleomorphic nuclei, ductuloinsular complexes, and neoformation of islets from ducts. These changes can be found as diffuse or focal forms of nesidioblastosis. Although most cases occur sporadically, several genetic defects ( SUR1, Kir6.2, GCK, and GLUD1 genes) have been described in neonates. In adults a higher rate of nesidioblastosis is observed in conjunction with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. The disease is diagnosed biochemically by a supervised fasting test in adults and in neonates by determining the glucose requirements to maintain normoglycemia, inappropriately high insulin and c-peptide levels, low free fatty acid and ketone body concentrations, glycemic response to glucagons, and the absence of ketonuria. If all highly selective noninvasive imaging techniques fail to identify a tumor, selective arterial calcium stimulation testing for gradient-guided surgery in adults and percutaneous transhepatic pancreatic venous sampling in neonates should be performed. a 95% pancreatectomy is necessary in neonates with a diffuse form of nesidioblastosis, whereas focal forms can be treated by partial pancreatectomy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00268-004-7598-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaczirek, K., & Niederle, B.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Kaczirek, Klaus
Venue
World Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11-04
Volume
28
Issue
12
Pages
1227-1230
ISSN
  • 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2323
OpenAlex
W2023426632
Cited by
62
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • World Journal of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
nesidioblastosis, congenital hyperinsulinism, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, pancreatic islet hyperplasia, neonatal hypoglycemia, Kir6.2, GCK gene, fasting test, pancreatic resection, partial pancreatectomy
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Hyperinsulinism, Infant, Newborn, Pancreas, Pancreatectomy, Nesidioblastosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review