The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biliopancreatic Diversion
Abstract
Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) has made reacceptable the malabsorptive approach to the surgical treatment of obesity. The procedure, in a series of 2241 patients operated on during a 21‐year period, caused a mean permanent reduction of about 75% of the initial excess weight. The indefinite weight maintenance appears to be due to the existence of a threshold absorption capacity for fat and starch, and thus energy, and the weight loss is partly due to increased resting energy expenditure. Beneficial effects other than those consequent to weight loss or reduced nutrient absorption included permanent normalization of serum glucose and cholesterol without any medication and on totally free diet in 100% of cases, both phenomena being due to a specific action of the operation. Operative mortality was less than 0.5%. Specific late complications included anemia, less than 5% with adequate iron or folate supplementation (or both); stomal ulcer, reduced to 3.2% by oral H 2‐blocker prophylaxis; bone demineralization, increasing up to the fourth year and tending to decrease thereafter, with need of calcium and vitamin D supplementation; neurologic complications, totally avoidable by prompt vitamin B administration to patients at risk; protein malnutrition, which was reduced to a minimum of 3% with 1.3% recurrence, in exchange with a smaller weight loss, by adapting the volume of the gastric remnant and the length of the alimentary limb to the patient's individual characteristics. It is concluded that the correct use of BPD, based on the knowledge of its mechanisms of action, can make the procedure an effective, safe one in all hands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bariatric Surgery versus Conventional Medical Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes
Mingrone, G., Panunzi, S., De Gaetano, A., Guidone, C., Iaconelli, A., Leccesi, L., Nanni, G., Pomp, A., Castagneto, M., Ghirlanda, G., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1200111 · Cited by 1,791
Slater, G. H., Ren, C. J., Siegel, N., Williams, T., Barr, D., Wolfe, B., Dolan, K., & Fielding, G. A. (2004) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.gassur.2003.09.020 · Cited by 489
Bariatric surgery and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review
Vest, A. R., Heneghan, H. M., Agarwal, S., Schauer, P. R., & Young, J. B. (2012) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2012-301778 · Cited by 336
AGA technical review on obesity
Klein, S., Wadden, T., & Sugerman, H. J. (2002) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2002.35514 · Cited by 274
Wernicke Encephalopathy After Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review
Aasheim, E. T. (2008) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181884308 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Scopinaro, N., Adami, G. F., Marinari, G. M., Gianetta, E., Traverso, E., Friedman, D., Camerini, G., Baschieri, G., & Simonelli, A.
- Venue
- World Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 936-946
- ISSN
- 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2323
- OpenAlex
- W4239052584
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biliopancreatic Diversion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s002689900497
- The paper
- Scopinaro, N., Adami, G. F., Marinari, G. M., Gianetta, E., Traverso, E., Friedman, D., Camerini, G., Baschieri, G., & Simonelli, A. (1998). Biliopancreatic Diversion. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689900497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.