Cited by 12Tactile and Sensory InteractionsClassical Anatomy and HistologyComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tree of Vater–Pacinian corpuscles in the human finger and thumb: a comparison between the late fetal stage and old age

Kobayashi, Komei, Cho, Kwang Ho, Yamamoto, Masahito, Mitomo, Keisuke, Murakami, Gen, Abe, Hiroshi, Abe, Shinichi·2018·Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

Abstract

Using histological sections of 12 hands from 12 human fetuses at 20-34 weeks of gestation (150-290 mm) and 14 fingers (index and small) from seven donated cadavers of elderly individuals (aged 78-95 years), we compared the features of Vater-Pacinian corpuscles between these two stages of life. Corpuscles with thin, tightly packed lamellae appeared to undergo a change to thick, loosely packed lamellae at 23-32 weeks. The typical fetal corpuscle had two parts: (1) a rod-like proximal part (0.2-0.6 mm in length) extending along the proximodistal axis of the finger, and (2) a distal end (0.1 mm) after acute bending of the proximal part. Corpuscles were associated with palmar digital nerves in the fingers, but were also present along the dorsal nerves in the thumb. A flower bouquet- or tree-like arrangement including 5-10 corpuscles extended to the dermis of the skin along a perforating artery. Serial sections of the thumb and fifth finger revealed approximately 80-180 corpuscles in the distal phalangeal segment. In elderly individuals, the corpuscles were distributed along the palmar digital nerve, but (1) their density was much lower than in fetuses and (2) a bouquet- or tree-like arrangement was rarely seen. In the distal segment, there were fewer than 40 adult corpuscles, being 0.2-0.5 mm thick and 1.0-2.5 mm long. Wavy or coiled corpuscles were evident. Because of the considerable differences in the distribution and number of corpuscles between the fetus and adult, they appear to undergo considerable depletion with age, especially along thin, superficial nerve branches.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00276-017-1894-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in elderly individuals report much lower numbers of Pacinian corpuscles.

    “On the other hand, studies in elderly individuals report much lower numbers.”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Kobayashi et al. 2018

  • A more recent count in several distal finger segments yielded around 40 corpuscles per segment, still much lower than fetal tissue.

    “A more recent count in several distal finger segments yielded proportionally higher numbers (around 40 corpuscles per segment), but these counts were still much lower than those in fetal tissue (Kobayashi et al. 2018).”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Kobayashi et al. 2018

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Albuerne M, Lopez S, Naves F, Martinez-Almagro A, Represa J, Vega J (1998) S100 and S100 proteins in human cutaneous sensory corpuscles: effects of nerve and spinal cord injury. Anat Rec 251:351–359 · DOI
  2. Barbolini G, Tischendorf F, Curri S (1971) Histology, histochemistry, and function of the human digital arteriovenous anastomoses (Hoyer–Grosser’s organs, Masson’s glomera): I. The possible relationship with Pacinian corpuscles. Microvasc Res 3(2):142–153 · DOI
  3. Calavia M, Vina E, Menendez-Gonzalez M, Lopez-Muniz A, Alonso-Guervos M, Cobo J, Otero J, Arias-Carrion O, Antonio Vega J, Garcia-Suarez O (2012) Evidence of nestin-positive cells in the human cutaneus Meissner and Pacinian corpuscles. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets (formerly Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord) 11(7):869–877
  4. Cauna N, Mannan G (1959) Development and postnatal changes of digital Pacinian corpuscles (corpuscula lamellosa) in the human hand. J Anat 93(Pt 3):271
  5. Ehrmantant WR, Graham WP III, Towfighi J, Mackay DR, Ehrlich HP (2004) A histological and anatomical profile of pacinian corpuscles from Dupuytren’s contracture and the expression of nerve growth factor receptor. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(3):721–727 · DOI
  6. Ferner H, Pernkopf E (1963) Atlas der topographischen und angewandten Anatomie des Menschen. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Vienna
  7. García-Suárez O, Montano J, Esteban I, González-Martínez T, Alvarez-Abad C, López-Arranz E, Cobo J, Vega J (2009) Myelin basic protein-positive nerve fibres in human Meissner corpuscles. J Anat 214(6):888–893 · DOI
  8. García FC, Acosta DR, González JMD, Lima MS (2015) Hyperplasia and hypertrophy of Pacinian corpuscles: a case report. Am J Dermatopathol 37(8):e100–e101 · DOI
  9. Greider JL, Flatt AE (1982) Glomus tumor associated with Pacinian hyperplasia—case report. J Hand Surg 7(2):113–117 · DOI
  10. Hirasawa Y, Sakakida K, Tokioka T, Ohta Y (1985) An investigation of the digital nerves of the thumb. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:191–196 · DOI
  11. Ide C, Tohyama K (1985) Macrophages in Pacinian corpuscles. Cells Tissues Organs 121(2):110–114 · DOI
  12. Keibel F, Mall FP (1912) Manual of human embryology, vol 2. JB Lippincott Company, Philadelphia
  13. Komforti M, Cummings TJ (2015) An extraordinary association of glomus tumor and Pacinian hyperplasia in the hand of a female patient. Am J Dermatopathol 37(9):719–720 · DOI
  14. Kumamoto K, Senuma H, Ebara S, Matsuura T (1993) Distribution of Pacinian corpuscles in the hand of the monkey, Macaca fuscata. J Anat 183(Pt 1):149
  15. Pawson NBS, Bolanowski Stanley J, Lorraine (2000) Immunocytochemical identification of proteins within the Pacinian corpuscle. Somatosens Mot Res 17(2):159–170 · DOI
  16. Rico B, Solas M, Clement J, Suarez I, Fernandez B (1996) Ultrastructural study of the Pacinian corpuscles in the newborn and adult dog forefoot. Eur J Morphol 34(4):311–320 · DOI
  17. Saxod R (1996) Ontogeny of the cutaneous sensory organs. Microsc Res Tech 34(4):313–333 · DOI
  18. Stark B, Carlstedt T, Hallin R, Risling M (1998) Distribution of human Pacinian corpuscles in the hand A cadaver study. J Hand Surg (Br and Eur Vol) 23(3):370–372 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Vega J, Llamosas M, Huerta J, García-Fernández J (1996) Study of human cutaneous sensory corpuscles using double immunolabelling and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Anat Rec 246(4):557–560 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kobayashi, K., Cho, K. H., Yamamoto, M., Mitomo, K., Murakami, G., Abe, H., & Abe, S.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Dental College (JP)
  • Wonkwang University Hospital (KR)
Corresponding author
Cho, Kwang Ho
Venue
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Published
2017-06-26
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
243-257
ISSN
  • 0930-1038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1279-8517
OpenAlex
W2628001370
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (JSPS KAKENHI No. 16K08435)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Classical Anatomy and Histology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
finger, thumb, fetal development, aging, palmar digital nerves, histology
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cadaver, Female, Fetus, Fingers, Humans, Male, Pacinian Corpuscles, Thumb

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review