The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Big data analysis of treatment patterns and outcomes among elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients in the United States
Open accessAbstract
Over half of patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are 65 years or older. We examined patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival among elderly patients in routine clinical practice. We utilized a retrospective cohort analysis of first primary AML patients in the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Patients were diagnosed between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2009, >66 years, and continuously enrolled in Medicare Part A and B in the year prior to diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression assessed overall survival by treatment. There were 3327 (40 %) patients who received chemotherapy within 3 months of diagnosis. Treated patients were more likely younger, male, and married, and less likely to have secondary AML and poor performance indicators and comorbidity score compared to untreated patients. In multivariate survival analysis, treated patients exhibited a significant 33 % lower risk of death compared to untreated patients. Significant survival benefits were noted with receipt of intensive and hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapies compared to no therapy. A survival benefit with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was seen in younger Medicare patients. This real-world study showed that about 60 % of elderly AML patients remain untreated following diagnosis. Use of anti-leukemic therapy was associated with a significant survival benefit in this elderly cohort.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · Cited by 49,742
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network: Present and future directions
McGivney, W. T. (1998) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10+<2057::aid-cncr14>3.0.co;2-a · Cited by 16,766
Siegel, R., Naishadham, D., & Jemal, A. (2013) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21166 · Cited by 11,825
Vardiman, J. W., Thiele, J., Arber, D. A., Brunning, R. D., Borowitz, M. J., Porwit, A., Harris, N. L., Le Beau, M. M., Hellström-Lindberg, E., Tefferi, A., et al. (2009) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262 · Cited by 4,424
Underrepresentation of Patients 65 Years of Age or Older in Cancer-Treatment Trials
Hutchins, L. F., Unger, J. M., Crowley, J. J., Coltman, C. A., & Albain, K. S. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199912303412706 · Cited by 2,174
Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials: Race-, Sex-, and Age-Based Disparities
Murthy, V. H., Krumholz, H. M., & Gross, C. P. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.22.2720 · Cited by 2,078
Warren, J. L., Klabunde, C. N., Schrag, D., Bach, P. B., & Riley, G. F. (2002) · PubMed · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000020942.47004.03 · Cited by 1,714
Immortal Time Bias in Pharmacoepidemiology
Suissa, S. (2008) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwm324 · Cited by 1,708
Age and acute myeloid leukemia
Appelbaum, F. R., Gundacker, H., Head, D. R., Slovak, M. L., Willman, C. L., Godwin, J. E., Anderson, J. E., & Petersdorf, S. H. (2006) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2005-09-3724 · Cited by 1,350
Cited by
Kurtz, S. E., Eide, C. A., Kaempf, A., Mori, M., Tognon, C. E., Borate, U., Druker, B. J., & Tyner, J. W. (2018) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/s41375-018-0225-7 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Medeiros, B. C., Satram-Hoang, S., Hurst, D., Hoang, K. Q., Momin, F., & Reyes, C.
- Venue
- Annals of Hematology
- Published
- 2015-03-20
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1127-1138
- ISSN
- 0939-5555 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0584
- OpenAlex
- W1970758655
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 18.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Big data analysis of treatment patterns and outcomes among elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00277-015-2351-x
- The paper
- Medeiros, B. C., Satram-Hoang, S., Hurst, D., Hoang, K. Q., Momin, F., & Reyes, C. (2015). Big data analysis of treatment patterns and outcomes among elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients in the United States. Annals of Hematology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-015-2351-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.