Onlinepsychotherapie in Zeiten der Coronapandemie
Open accessAbstract
Background The prevalence of mental illnesses in the population has enormously increased during the corona pandemic due to the accompanying burdens and distress. Therefore, it is important to continue with the provision of psychotherapeutic treatment even in times of social distancing. As a result, psychotherapists were soon confronted with the need to expand their traditional treatment setting and offer remote treatment.Objective Which digital treatment options are available to psychotherapists since the pandemic, also with respect to the legal regulations? To what extent and how did they use video-based or telephone-based psychotherapy? What is the current stage of research regarding the effectiveness of video(telephony)? How can therapeutic alliance be built into video(telephony) settings? How can psychotherapists successfully apply their personal therapeutic method to different patient groups (children, adolescents, adults) in the new digital setting?Methods These questions are answered based on a literature search and clinical considerations.Results The majority of psychotherapists have immediately adapted to remote treatment. This has been supported by the government by expanding existing regulations in order to continue treatment with current and new patients without physical contact during the pandemic crisis. Survey studies have shown that psychotherapists consider the effectiveness of digital treatment settings to be lower than the traditional setting.Conclusion Further training is necessary to educate psychotherapists in the theory, practice and self-awareness for quality assurance in the video(telephony) setting.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The prevalence of mental illness increased in children, adolescents, and young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.
“The prevalence of mental illness increased in children, adolescents, and young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, while at the same time, access to treatment facilities has been restricted, resulting in a need for the quick implementation of remote or online interventions.”
From Effectiveness of Online and Remote Interventions for Mental Health in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults After the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
In “Zur Notwendigkeit der psychotherapeutischen Onlineversorgung” (page unavailable), the paper reports increased prevalence of mental-health problems in the general population, with the largest increase among younger adults aged 18–34. In “Varianten von Onlinepsychotherapie” (page unavailable), it reports greater distress and poorer quality of life among children and adolescents, but not an increase in the prevalence of mental illness in those groups. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe sudden switch to online interventions seemingly decreased perceived barriers by psychotherapists to use online or remote treatment options.
“These offers led to a sudden increase in therapists using online interventions [8,25-27], thereby seemingly decreasing perceived barriers by psychotherapists to use online or remote treatment options [8,26].”
The pandemic led to a sudden increase in therapists using online interventions.
“These offers led to a sudden increase in therapists using online interventions [8,25-27], thereby seemingly decreasing perceived barriers by psychotherapists to use online or remote treatment options [8,26].”
Access to treatment facilities was restricted during the COVID-19 pandemic.
“The prevalence of mental illness increased in children, adolescents, and young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, while at the same time, access to treatment facilities has been restricted, resulting in a need for the quick implementation of remote or online interventions.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Eichenberg, C.
- Affiliations
- Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Eichenberg, Christiane
- Venue
- Psychotherapeut
- Published
- 2021-01-13
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 195-202
- ISSN
- 0935-6185 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2080
- PMC
- PMC7805257
- OpenAlex
- W3119740718
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychotherapeut (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- online therapy, external beam radiotherapy, COVID-19 pandemic, telephone psychotherapy, remote therapy, therapeutic relationship, psychotherapy training, children and adolescents, mental health during pandemic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review