Theorie und Praxis der Trauma-fokussierten Mentalisierungsbasierten Therapie: Ist eine Traumabehandlung in der Gruppe möglich?
Open accessAbstract
Zusammenfassung Derzeit gibt es noch keine offiziellen Behandlungsrichtlinien für die komplexe posttraumatische Belastungsstörung (kPTBS). Die kPTBS unterscheidet sich von der PTBS durch die Symptomatik, Dauer oder Häufigkeit der Traumaexposition und durch eine hohe Komorbidität mit der Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung (BPS). Daher besteht Bedarf an der Entwicklung neuer Behandlungsmethoden, die auf diese Patient:innengruppe ausgerichtet sind. Im Folgenden wird eine neue Trauma-fokussierte Mentalisierungsbasierte Therapie, die für Patienten mit einer kPTBS entwickelt wurde und als Gruppenbehandlung konzipiert ist, beschrieben. Neben dem theoretischen Hintergrund und dem konzeptuellen Rahmen von Trauma in der mentalisierungsbasierten Therapie wird der Ablauf der Behandlung ausführlich dargestellt und anhand eines Fallbeispiels illustriert.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Specific trauma-focused dialectical behavior therapy and mentalization-based treatment programs have been developed for borderline personality disorder patients with comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder.
“Only more recently, specific trauma-focused DBT and MBT programs have been developed for BPD patients with comorbid PTSD, underscoring the importance of trauma processing in the treatment of patients with PTSD and BPD (6–8).”
From Timing of imagery rescripting during schema therapy for borderline personality disorder: the LUCY trial (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 6
- Authors
- Rüfenacht, E. N., Shaverin, L., Bateman, A., Fonagy, P., & Taubner, S.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
- The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Taubner, Svenja
- Venue
- Die Psychotherapie
- Published
- 2023-09-20
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 458-465
- ISSN
- 2731-7161 (ISSN-L)
- 2731-717X
- OpenAlex
- W4386890515
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Die Psychotherapie (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- complex PTSD, borderline personality disorder, group therapy, treatment development, case examples
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
