Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Desulfobulbus aggregans sp. nov., a novel sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from marine sediment from the Gulf of Gabes

Kharrat, Hanen, Karray, Fatma, Bartoli, Manon, Ben Hnia, Wajdi, Mhiri, Najla, Fardeau, Marie-Laure, Bennour, Feten, Kamoun, Lotfi, Alazard, Didier, Sayadi, Sami·2017·Current Microbiology

Abstract

Three sulfate-reducing bacterial strains designated SM40 T , SM41, and SM43 were isolated from marine sediment in the region of Skhira located in the Gulf of Gabes (Tunisia). These strains grew in anaerobic media with phosphogypsum as a sulfate source and sodium lactate as an electron and carbon source. One of them, strain SM40 T , was characterized by phenotypic and phylogenetic methods. Cells were ovoid, Gram-stain-negative and non-motile. The temperature limits for growth were 10 and 55 °C with an optimum at 35 °C and the pH range was 6.5-8.1 with an optimum at pH 7.5. Growth was observed at salinities ranging from 10 to 80 g NaCl l -1 with an optimum at 30 g NaCl l -1 . Strain SM40 T was able to utilize butanol, ethanol, formate, L-glucose, glycerol, lactate, propanol, propionate, and pyruvate as electron donors for the reduction of sulfate, sulfite, or thiosulfate to H 2 S. Without electron acceptors, strain SM40 T fermented butanol and pyruvate. The DNA G+C content of strain SM40 T was 52.6 mol %. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the isolate revealed that strain SM40 T was closely related to the species in the genus Desulfobulbus of the family Desulfobulbaceae. The sequence similarity between strain SM40 and Desulfobulbus marinus was 95.4%. The phylogenetic analysis, DNA G+C content, and differences in substrate utilization suggested that strain SM40 represents a new species of the genus Desulfobulbus, D. aggregans sp. nov. The type strain is…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00284-017-1211-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, Kulam-Syed-Mohideen AS, McGarrell DM, Marsh T, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM (2009) The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 37:141–145 · DOI
  3. Cord-Ruwisch R (1985) A quick method for the determination of dissolved and precipitated sulfides in cultures of sulfate reducing bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 4:33–36 · DOI
  4. Devereux R, Delaney M, Widdel F, Stahl DA (1989) Natural relationships among sulfate-reducing eubacteria. J Bacteriol 171:6689–6695 · DOI
  5. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Fardeau ML, Ollivier B, Patel B K C, Magot M, Thomas P, Rimbault A, Rocchiccioli F, Garcia JL (1997) Thermotoga hypogea sp. nov., a xylanolytic, thermophilic bacterium from an oil-producing well. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:1013–1019 · DOI
  7. Felsenstein J (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likehood approach. J Mol Evol 17:368–376 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits of phylogenesis. Evol Int J org Evol 39:783–791 · DOI
  9. Fitch WM (1971) Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 20:406–416 · DOI
  10. Hungate RE (1969) A roll tube method for the cultivation of strict anaerobes. Method Microbiol 3B:117–132 · DOI
  11. Jørgensen BB (1982) Mineralization of organic matter in the seabed: the role of sulphate reduction. Nature 296:643–645 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kuever J, Rainey FA, Widdel F (2005) Class IV Deltaproteobacteria class nov. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM (eds.) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 2, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 922–1144 · DOI
  13. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874 · DOI
  14. Lien T, Madsen M, Steen IH, Gjerdevik K (1998) Desulfobulbus rhabdoformis sp. nov., a sulfate reducer from a water-oil separation system. Int J Syst Bact 48:469–474 · DOI
  15. Louati A, Elleuch B, Kallel M, Saliot A, Dagaut J (2001) Hydrocarbon contamination of coastal sediments from the Sfax area (Tunisia), Mediterranean Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 42:445–452 · DOI
  16. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman W (1989) Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bact 39:159–167 · DOI
  17. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:405–425
  18. Samain E, Dubourguier HC, Albagnac G (1984) Isolation and characterization of Desulfobulbus elongatus sp. nov. from a mesophilic industrial digester. Syst Appl Microbiol 5:391–401 · DOI
  19. Sass A, Rutters H, Cypionka H, Sass H (2002) Desulfobulbus mediterraneus sp. nov., a sulfate-reducing bacterium growing on mono- and disaccharides. Arch Microbiol 177:468–474 · DOI
  20. Sorokin DY, Tourova TP, Panteleeva AN, Muyzer G (2012) Desulfonatronobacter acidivorans gen. nov., sp. nov. and Desulfobulbus alkaliphilus sp. nov., haloalkaliphilic heterotrophic sulfate-reducing bacteria from soda lakes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:2107–2113 · DOI
  21. Soussi N, Ennet P, Koponen J, Sarkkula J, Ben Mustapha S (1995) Impact of the phosphogypsum waste in the Gulf of Gabes (Tunisia). In: Proceedings of the second international conference on the mediterranean coastal environment, Tarragona, Spain, pp 24–27
  22. Suzuki D, Ueki A, Amaishi A, Ueki K (2007) Diversity of substrate utilization and growth characteristics of sulfate-reducing bacteria isolated from estuarine sediment in Japan. J Gen Appl Microbiol 53:119–132 · DOI
  23. Weisburg W, Barns S, Pelletier D, Lane D (1991) 16 S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bact 173:697–703 · DOI
  24. Widdel F, Pfennig N (1981) Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. I. Isolation of new sulfate-reducing bacteria enriched with acetate from saline environments. Description of Desulfobacter postgatei gen. nov., sp. nov. Arch Microbiol 129:395–400 · DOI
  25. Widdel F, Pfennig N (1982) Studies on dissimilatory sulfate reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. II. Incomplete oxidation of propionate by Desulfobulbus propionicus gen. nov., sp. nov. Arch Microbiol 131:360–365 · DOI
  26. Zaghden H, Kallel M, Louati A, Elleuch B, Oudot J (2005) Hydrocarbons in surface sediments from the Sfax coastal zone (Tunisia), Mediterranean Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 50:1287–1294 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kharrat, H., Karray, F., Bartoli, M., Ben Hnia, W., Mhiri, N., Fardeau, M.-L., Bennour, F., Kamoun, L., Alazard, D., & Sayadi, S.
Venue
Current Microbiology
Published
2017-02-17
Volume
74
Issue
4
Pages
449-454
ISSN
  • 0343-8651
  • 1432-0991
Cited by
35
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review