The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Real-world incidence and prevalence of low back pain using routinely collected data
Open accessAbstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem among adults of working age population, and its prevalence or incidence increases with increasing in age. The purpose of this review was to examine the real-world prevalence or incidence of LBP. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance to the PRISMA guideline. Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, SportDiscuss and Scopus electronic databases were searched using specifically developed search strategies to identify studies using patients' electronic medical records published in English up to February 2019. The quality of the included studies was assessed using a tool that consists of ten items addressing a risk of bias. The search yielded 756 published studies, of which 13 were deemed relevant and were included in this review. The included studies reported incidence or prevalence data from Canada, United States of America (USA), Sweden, Belgium, Finland, Israel, and Netherlands. All the included studies were assessed to be methodologically sound (low risk of bias). The prevalence and incidence of LBP ranged from 1.4 to 20.0% and 0.024-7.0%, respectively. Three studies reported that the Odds of LBP in male patient was higher than their female counterparts (odds ratio > 1; range 1.11-17.29). Nine studies identified the risk factors of LBP to be age, sex, and race. The remaining four studies also listed high intensity of physical activity, high spinal load, lifting, bending, and twisting as the risk factors for LBP. The results of this study highlighted there is a substantial difference within studies that estimated the prevalence and incidence of LBP. This finding could inform healthcare policy makers to critically examine the data sources of prevalence and incidence studies; this in return might help for resource allocation to manage the condition.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017078598, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain
Hoy, D., Bain, C., Williams, G., March, L., Brooks, P., Blyth, F., Woolf, A., Vos, T., & Buchbinder, R. (2012) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.34347 · Cited by 3,005
Hoy, D., Brooks, P., Woolf, A., Blyth, F., March, L., Bain, C., Baker, P., Smith, E., & Buchbinder, R. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014 · Cited by 2,555
The epidemiology of low back pain
Hoy, D., Brooks, P., Blyth, F., & Buchbinder, R. (2010) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2010.10.002 · Cited by 2,037
The Prevalence of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1966 to 1998
Walker, B. F. (2000) · Journal of Spinal Disorders · doi:10.1097/00002517-200006000-00003 · Cited by 1,144
Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Spine Pain
Rubin, D. I. (2007) · Neurologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2007.01.004 · Cited by 796
Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
Gasparyan, A. Y., Ayvazyan, L., Blackmore, H., & Kitas, G. D. (2011) · Rheumatology International · doi:10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3 · Cited by 694
The Prevalence of low back pain in Africa: a systematic review
Louw, Q. A., Morris, L. D., & Grimmer-Somers, K. (2007) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-8-105 · Cited by 453
Cited by
Knezevic, N. N., Candido, K. D., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Van Zundert, J., & Cohen, S. P. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00733-9 · Cited by 1,345
Metadata
- Authors
- Fatoye, F., Gebrye, T., & Odeyemi, I.
- Venue
- Rheumatology International
- Published
- 2019-03-08
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 619-626
- ISSN
- 0172-8172 (ISSN-L)
- 1437-160X
- OpenAlex
- W2920828889
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 22.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real-world incidence and prevalence of low back pain using routinely collected data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00296-019-04273-0
- The paper
- Fatoye, F., Gebrye, T., & Odeyemi, I. (2019). Real-world incidence and prevalence of low back pain using routinely collected data. Rheumatology International. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04273-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.