Cited by 43Plant tissue culture and regenerationWeed Control and Herbicide ApplicationsPlant Genetic and Mutation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficient callus formation and plant regeneration of goosegrass [Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.]

Yemets, A., Klimkina, L., Tarassenko, L., Blume, Y.·2003·Plant Cell Reports

Abstract

Efficient methods in totipotent callus formation, cell suspension culture establishment and whole-plant regeneration have been developed for the goosegrass [ Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.] and its dinitroaniline-resistant biotypes. The optimum medium for inducing morphogenic calli consisted of N6 basal salts and B5 vitamins supplemented with 1-2 mg l(-1) 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), 2 mg l(-1) glycine, 100 mg l(-1) asparagine, 100 mg l(-1) casein hydrolysate, 30 g l(-1) sucrose and 0.6% agar, pH 5.7. The presence of organogenic and embryogenic structures in these calli was histologically documented. Cell suspension cultures derived from young calli were established in a liquid medium with the same composition. Morphogenic structures of direct shoots and somatic embryos were grown into rooted plantlets on medium containing MS basal salts, B5 vitamins, 1 mg l(-1) kinetin (Kn) and 0.1 mg l(-1) indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), 3% sucrose, 0.6% agar, pH 5.7. Calli derived from the R-biotype of E. indica possessed a high resistance to trifluralin (dinitroaniline herbicide) and cross-resistance to a structurally non-related herbicide, amiprophosmethyl (phosphorothioamidate herbicide), as did the original resistant plants. Embryogenic cell suspension culture was a better source of E. indica protoplasts than callus or mesophyll tissue. The enzyme solution containing 1.5% cellulase Onozuka R-10, 0.5% driselase, 1% pectolyase Y-23, 0.5% hemicellulase and N(6) mineral salts with an…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00299-002-0549-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yemets, A., Klimkina, L., Tarassenko, L., & Blume, Y.
Affiliations
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (UA)
Corresponding author
Yemets, A.
Venue
Plant Cell Reports
Published
2003-02
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
503-510
ISSN
  • 0721-7714 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-203X
OpenAlex
W1267052785
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plant Cell Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Keywords
Eleusine indica, plant regeneration, cell suspension culture, somatic embryogenesis, trifluralin, cross-resistance, protoplast isolation, plant growth regulators, 2,4-D, kinetin
MeSH terms
Adenine, Cells, Cultured, Herbicides, Kinetin, Morphogenesis, Plant Growth Regulators, Protoplasts, Regeneration, Trifluralin, 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid, Plant Shoots, Microscopy, Confocal, Eleusine, Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review