Genetic Instability in Calamondin (Citrus madurensis Lour.) Plants Derived from Somatic Embryogenesis Induced by Diphenylurea Derivatives
Abstract
Somatic embryos were regenerated in vitro from calamondin style-stigma explants cultured in the presence of N (6)-benzylaminopurine (BAP) cytokinin and three synthetic phenylurea derivatives, N-(2-chloro-4-pyridyl)-N-phenylurea (4-CPPU), N-phenyl-N'-benzothiazol-6-ylurea (PBU) and N,N'-bis-(2,3-methilendioxyphenyl)urea (2,3-MDPU). The phenylurea derivative compounds tested at micromolar level (12 muM) were able to induce a percentage of responsive explants significantly higher from that obtained with BAP and hormone-free (HF) conditions. In order to verify the genetic stability of the regenerants, 27 plants coming from different embryogenic events were randomly selected from each different culture condition and evaluated for somaclonal variations using inter-simple sequence repeat and random amplified polymorphic DNA analyses. We observed that 2,3-MDPU and PBU gave 3.7% of somaclonal mutants, whereas 4-CPPU gave 7.4% of mutants. No somaclonal variability was observed when plantlets were regenerated in BAP or HF medium. Although diphenylurea derivatives show a higher embryogenic potential as compared to BAP, they induce higher levels of somaclonal variability. This finding should be taken in consideration when new protocols for clonal propagation are being developed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Citrus mitis, 4-CPPU, PBU, and 2,3-MDPU enhanced embryogenic potential, with 2,3-MDPU and PBU causing 3.7% somaclonal variation, while BAP/HF medium showed no variability.
“(4-CPPU, PBU, 2,3-MDPU) enhanced embryogenic BAP/HF medium showed somaclonal variation, while potential, with 2,3-MDPU and PBU causing 3.7%”
From Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [70]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 71 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Siragusa, M., Carra, A., Salvia, L., Puglia, A. M., De Pasquale, F., & Carimi, F.
- Affiliations
- National Research Council (IT)
- University of Palermo (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Carimi, Francesco
- Venue
- Plant Cell Reports
- Published
- 2007-03-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1289-1296
- ISSN
- 0721-7714 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-203X
- OpenAlex
- W2043960894
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Plant Cell Reports (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Keywords
- calamondin, somatic embryogenesis, phenylurea derivatives, benzylaminopurine, somaclonal variation, genomic instability, clonal propagation, micropropagation
- MeSH terms
- Carbanilides, Citrus, Culture Media, Polymorphism, Genetic, Mutagenesis, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Tissue Culture Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review