Cited by 46Plant tissue culture and regenerationPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesPlant Molecular Biology Research

Genetic Instability in Calamondin (Citrus madurensis Lour.) Plants Derived from Somatic Embryogenesis Induced by Diphenylurea Derivatives

Siragusa, Mirko, Carra, Angela, Salvia, Lidia, Puglia, Anna Maria, De Pasquale, Fabio, Carimi, Francesco·2007·Plant Cell Reports

Abstract

Somatic embryos were regenerated in vitro from calamondin style-stigma explants cultured in the presence of N (6)-benzylaminopurine (BAP) cytokinin and three synthetic phenylurea derivatives, N-(2-chloro-4-pyridyl)-N-phenylurea (4-CPPU), N-phenyl-N'-benzothiazol-6-ylurea (PBU) and N,N'-bis-(2,3-methilendioxyphenyl)urea (2,3-MDPU). The phenylurea derivative compounds tested at micromolar level (12 muM) were able to induce a percentage of responsive explants significantly higher from that obtained with BAP and hormone-free (HF) conditions. In order to verify the genetic stability of the regenerants, 27 plants coming from different embryogenic events were randomly selected from each different culture condition and evaluated for somaclonal variations using inter-simple sequence repeat and random amplified polymorphic DNA analyses. We observed that 2,3-MDPU and PBU gave 3.7% of somaclonal mutants, whereas 4-CPPU gave 7.4% of mutants. No somaclonal variability was observed when plantlets were regenerated in BAP or HF medium. Although diphenylurea derivatives show a higher embryogenic potential as compared to BAP, they induce higher levels of somaclonal variability. This finding should be taken in consideration when new protocols for clonal propagation are being developed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00299-007-0326-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Citrus mitis, 4-CPPU, PBU, and 2,3-MDPU enhanced embryogenic potential, with 2,3-MDPU and PBU causing 3.7% somaclonal variation, while BAP/HF medium showed no variability.

    “(4-CPPU, PBU, 2,3-MDPU) enhanced embryogenic BAP/HF medium showed somaclonal variation, while potential, with 2,3-MDPU and PBU causing 3.7%”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 71 · Cited by 46

Authors
Siragusa, M., Carra, A., Salvia, L., Puglia, A. M., De Pasquale, F., & Carimi, F.
Affiliations
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • University of Palermo (IT)
Corresponding author
Carimi, Francesco
Venue
Plant Cell Reports
Published
2007-03-02
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
1289-1296
ISSN
  • 0721-7714 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-203X
OpenAlex
W2043960894
Cited by
46
References
71
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plant Cell Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
calamondin, somatic embryogenesis, phenylurea derivatives, benzylaminopurine, somaclonal variation, genomic instability, clonal propagation, micropropagation
MeSH terms
Carbanilides, Citrus, Culture Media, Polymorphism, Genetic, Mutagenesis, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Tissue Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review