CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7Marine animal studies overviewWildlife Ecology and ConservationAvian ecology and behavior

Bottom-feeding gray whales Eschrichtius robustus demonstrate a finer scale of site fidelity than pelagic-feeding humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae on an Arctic feeding ground

Filatova, Olga A., Fedutin, Ivan D., Pridorozhnaya, Tatiana P., Hoyt, Erich·2022·Polar Biology
DOI 10.1007/s00300-022-03048-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00300-022-03048-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some gray whales show fidelity to the coast of Chukotka and are therefore most likely to be affected by environmental conditions in that region.

    “Support for this hypothesis comes from studies that found some gray whales show fidelity to the coast of Chukotka (Heide-Jørgensen et al., 2012;Filatova et al., 2022) and are therefore most likely to be affected by environmental conditions in that region.”

    From Update on the status of gray whales since the 2020 Implementation Review (2024) · cites this paper as Filatova et al., 2022

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Update on the status of gray whales since the 2020 Implementation Review

    Scordino, J., Bickham, J. W., Brandon, J. R., Brownell, R. L., Burdin, A., Doniol-Valcroze, T., Eguchi, T., Givens, G. H., Lang, A. R., Litovka, D. I., et al. (2024) · J. Cetacean Res. Manage. · doi:10.47536/jcrm.v25i1.942 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

    “Support for this hypothesis comes from studies that found some gray whales show fidelity to the coast of Chukotka (Heide‐ Jørgensen et al ., 2012; Filatova et al ., 2022) and are therefore most likely to be affected by environmental conditions in that region.”

Authors
Filatova, O. A., Fedutin, I. D., Pridorozhnaya, T. P., & Hoyt, E.
Affiliations
  • Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
  • National Milk Records (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Filatova, Olga A.
ORCID
Venue
Polar Biology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-06
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
1013-1021
ISSN
  • 0722-4060 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2056
DOI
10.1007/s00300-022-03048-x
OpenAlex
W4281777931
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Polar Biology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Russian Science Foundation (22-24-00002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
gray whale, humpback whale, site fidelity, fine-scale movement, bottom feeding, Eastern Chukotka, whale conservation, Arctic warming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review