Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Parasellar lesions

Ruscalleda, J.·2005·European Radiology
DOI 10.1007/s00330-004-2628-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00330-004-2628-2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Elster AD (1993) Modern imaging of the pituitary. Radiology 187:1?14 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Gallioud P, Ruiz D, Muster M, et al (2000) Angiographic anatomy of laterocavernous sinus. Am J Neuroradiol 21:1923?1929
  3. Keane JR (1996) Cavernous sinus syndrome. Analysis of 151 cases. Arch Neurol 53:967?971 · doi:10.1001/archneur.1996.00550100033012
  4. Hudson J, Rufenacht DA, Ehman RL, Wiebers DO (1991) Intracranial aneurysms and vascular malformations: comparison of time-of-flight and phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 181:721?730 · doi:10.1148/radiology.181.3.1947088
  5. Niieo M, Shimozuru T, Nakamura K, et al (2000) Long-term follow-up study of patients with cavernous sinus aneurysm treated by proximal occlusion. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 40:88?96 · doi:10.2176/nmc.40.88
  6. Hahn CD, Nicolle DA, Lownie SP, Drake CG (2000) Giant cavernous carotid aneurysms: clinical presentation in fifty-seven cases. J Neuroophthalmol 20:253?258 · doi:10.1097/00041327-200020040-00010
  7. Debrun GM, Vinuela F, Fox AJ, et al (1988) Indications for treatment and classification of 132 carotid?cavernous fistulas. Neurosurgery 22:285?289 · doi:10.1227/00006123-198802000-00001
  8. Ozwa T, Minakawa T, Saito A, et al (2001) MRA demonstration of ?periarteritis? in Tolosa?Hunt syndrome. Acta Neurochir 143:309?312 · doi:10.1007/s007010170112
  9. Cakirer S (2003) MRI findings in the patients with the presumptive clinical diagnosis of Tolosa?Hunt syndrome. Eur Radiol 13(1):17?28 · doi:10.1007/s00330-002-1458-3
  10. Cottier J, Destrieux C, Brunereau J, et al (2000) Cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary adenoma: MR imaging. Radiology 215:463?469 · doi:10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ap18463
  11. Oot RF, Melville GE, New PFJ, et al (1988) The role of MR and CT in evaluating clival chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Am J Nueroradiol 9:715?723
  12. Hayward R (1999) The present and future management of childhood craniopharyngiomas. Childs Nerv Syst 15:764?769 · doi:10.1007/s003810050468
  13. Sartorettt-Schefer S, et al (1997) MR differentiation of adamantinomatous and squamous-papillary craniopharyngiomas. Am J Neuroradiol 18:77?78
  14. Boyko OB, Curnes JT, Oakes WJ, Burger PC (1991) Hamartomas of the tuber cinereum: CT, MR and pathological findings. Am J Neuroradiol 12:309?314
  15. Iglesias A, Arias M, Brasa J, Paramo C, et al (2000) MR imaging findings in granular cell tumor of the neurohypophysis: a difficult preoperative diagnosis. Eur Radiol 10:1871?1873 · doi:10.1007/s003300000488
  16. Mamata H, Matsumae M, Yanagimachi N, Matsuyama S, et al (1998) Parasellar dermoid tumor with intra-tumoral hemorrhage. Eur Radiol 8:1594?1597 · doi:10.1007/s003300050593

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ruscalleda, J.
Venue
European Radiology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2005-01-28
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
549-559
ISSN
  • 0938-7994
  • 1432-1084
DOI
10.1007/s00330-004-2628-2
Cited by
38
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.