Cited by 392Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Haralick texture analysis of prostate MRI: utility for differentiating non-cancerous prostate from prostate cancer and differentiating prostate cancers with different Gleason scores

Open access

Abstract

Objectives To investigate Haralick texture analysis of prostate MRI for cancer detection and differentiating Gleason scores (GS).Methods One hundred and forty-seven patients underwent T2- weighted (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted prostate MRI. Cancers ≥0.5 ml and non-cancerous peripheral (PZ) and transition (TZ) zone tissue were identified on T2WI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, using whole-mount pathology as reference. Texture features (Energy, Entropy, Correlation, Homogeneity, Inertia) were extracted and analysed using generalized estimating equations.Results PZ cancers (n = 143) showed higher Entropy and Inertia and lower Energy, Correlation and Homogeneity compared to non-cancerous tissue on T2WI and ADC maps (p-values: <.0001-0.008). In TZ cancers (n = 43) we observed significant differences for all five texture features on the ADC map (all p-values: <.0001) and for Correlation (p = 0.041) and Inertia (p = 0.001) on T2WI. On ADC maps, GS was associated with higher Entropy (GS 6 vs. 7: p = 0.0225; 6 vs. >7: p = 0.0069) and lower Energy (GS 6 vs. 7: p = 0.0116, 6 vs. >7: p = 0.0039). ADC map Energy (p = 0.0102) and Entropy (p = 0.0019) were significantly different in GS ≤3 + 4 versus ≥4 + 3 cancers; ADC map Entropy remained significant after controlling for the median ADC (p = 0.0291).Conclusion Several Haralick-based texture features appear useful for prostate cancer detection and GS assessment.Key points • Several Haralick texture features may differentiate non-cancerous and cancerous prostate tissue. • Tumour Energy and Entropy on ADC maps correlate with Gleason score. • T2w-image-derived texture features are not associated with the Gleason score.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00330-015-3701-8

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Donati OF, Mazaheri Y, Afaq A et al (2013) Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Assessment with Whole-Lesion Histogram Analysis of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient. Radiology. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130973:130973 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 392

Metadata

Authors
Wibmer, A., Hricak, H., Gondo, T., Matsumoto, K., Veeraraghavan, H., Fehr, D., Zheng, J., Goldman, D., Moskowitz, C., Fine, S. W., Reuter, V. E., Eastham, J., Sala, E., & Vargas, H. A.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wibmer, Andreas
Venue
European Radiology
Published
2015-05-21
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
2840-2850
ISSN
  • 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1084
OpenAlex
W313065440
Cited by
391
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 4
FWCI
29.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
prostate cancer, Gleason score, apparent diffusion coefficient, diffusion-weighted imaging, T2-weighted MRI, peripheral zone, transition zone, texture features, cancer detection
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Prostatectomy, Prostatic Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tumor Burden, Neoplasm Grading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review