Demystification of AI-driven medical image interpretation: past, present and future
Abstract
The recent explosion of 'big data' has ushered in a new era of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in every sphere of technological activity, including medicine, and in particular radiology. However, the recent success of AI in certain flagship applications has, to some extent, masked decades-long advances in computational technology development for medical image analysis. In this article, we provide an overview of the history of AI methods for radiological image analysis in order to provide a context for the latest developments. We review the functioning, strengths and limitations of more classical methods as well as of the more recent deep learning techniques. We discuss the unique characteristics of medical data and medical science that set medicine apart from other technological domains in order to highlight not only the potential of AI in radiology but also the very real and often overlooked constraints that may limit the applicability of certain AI methods. Finally, we provide a comprehensive perspective on the potential impact of AI on radiology and on how to evaluate it not only from a technical point of view but also from a clinical one, so that patients can ultimately benefit from it. KEY POINTS: • Artificial intelligence (AI) research in medical imaging has a long history • The functioning, strengths and limitations of more classical AI methods is reviewed, together with that of more recent deep learning methods. • A perspective is provided on the potential impact of AI on radiology and on its evaluation from both technical and clinical points of view.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Justifications never ensure that system categorical imperatives are achieved.
“we emphasize that justifications never ensure that system categorical imperatives are achieved [65], [66].”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [65]
The US Food and Drug Administration is presently contemplating new guidelines for digitization, one of which involves a switch inside the locus of control from finalized outcome to enterprises.
“The US Food and Drug Administration is presently contemplating new guidelines for digitization, one of which involves a switch inside the locus of control from finalized outcome to enterprises [65].”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [65]
Cites
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439 · see citing works
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Chamola, V., Hassija, V., Sulthana, A. R., Ghosh, D., Dhingra, D., & Sikdar, B. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3294569 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
“The US Food and Drug Administration is presently contem-plating new guidelines for digitization, one of which involves a switch inside the locus of control from finalized outcome to enterprises [65].”
BackgroundA systematic review on AI/ML approaches against COVID-19 outbreak
Dogan, O., Tiwari, S., Jabbar, M. A., & Guggari, S. (2021) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-021-00424-8 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Dumić-Čule, I., Orešković, T., Brkljačić, B., Kujundžić Tiljak, M., & Orešković, S. (2020) · Croatian Medical Journal · doi:10.3325/cmj.2020.61.457 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in radiology: who’s afraid of the big bad wolf?
Gallix, B., & Chong, J. (2019) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5995-9 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Savadjiev, P., Chong, J., Dohan, A., Vakalopoulou, M., Reinhold, C., Paragios, N., & Gallix, B.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- McGill University Health Centre (CA)
- Inserm (FR)
- Supélec (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Gallix, Benoit
- Venue
- European Radiology
- Published
- 2018-08-13
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1616-1624
- ISSN
- 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1084
- OpenAlex
- W2887021901
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in radiology, medical image analysis, deep learning, AI limitations
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Forecasting, Humans, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Technology, Radiologic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review