Artificial intelligence for detecting small FDG-positive lung nodules in digital PET/CT: impact of image reconstructions on diagnostic performance
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a deep learning algorithm for automated detection of small 18 F-FDG-avid pulmonary nodules in PET scans, and to assess whether novel block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) reconstruction affects detection accuracy as compared to ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction. Methods Fifty-seven patients with 92 18 F-FDG-avid pulmonary nodules (all ≤ 2 cm) undergoing PET/CT for oncological (re-)staging were retrospectively included and a total of 8824 PET images of the lungs were extracted using OSEM and BSREM reconstruction. Per-slice and per-nodule sensitivity of a deep learning algorithm was assessed, with an expert readout by a radiologist/nuclear medicine physician serving as standard of reference. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve of OSEM and BSREM were assessed and the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) were compared. A maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max )-based sensitivity analysis and a size-based sensitivity analysis with subgroups defined by nodule size was performed. Results The AUC of the deep learning algorithm for nodule detection using OSEM reconstruction was 0.796 (CI 95%; 0.772-0.869), and 0.848 (CI 95%; 0.828-0.869) using BSREM reconstruction. The AUC was significantly higher for BSREM compared to OSEM (p = 0.001). On a per-slice analysis, sensitivity and specificity were 66.7% and 79.0% for OSEM, and 69.2% and 84.5% for BSREM. On a per-nodule analysis…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PL reconstruction has repeatedly been shown to increase conspicuity and detection rates of pulmonary lesions, even compared to OSEM with PSF and/or TOF.
“PL reconstruction has repeatedly been shown to increase conspicuity and detection rates of pulmonary lesions, even compared to OSEM with PSF and/or TOF [112,113,164,173,174].”
From Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation (2022) · cites this paper as [174]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
MacMahon, H., Naidich, D. P., Goo, J. M., Lee, K. S., Leung, A. N. C., Mayo, J. R., Mehta, A. C., Ohno, Y., Powell, C. A., Prokop, M., et al. (2017) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161659 · Cited by 2,491 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This also led to the publication of recommendations from the Fleischner Society on how to deal with them [25], notably if incidentally detected on CT scans and in patients without any previous cancer history.”
BackgroundMachine learning for real-time prediction of complications in critical care: a retrospective study
Meyer, A., Zverinski, D., Pfahringer, B., Kempfert, J., Kuehne, T., Sündermann, S. H., Stamm, C., Hofmann, T., Falk, V., & Eickhoff, C. (2018) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(18)30300-x · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation
Rogasch, J. M. M., Hofheinz, F., van Heek, L., Voltin, C.-A., Boellaard, R., & Kobe, C. (2022) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics12020451 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schwyzer, M., Martini, K., Benz, D. C., Burger, I. A., Ferraro, D. A., Kudura, K., Treyer, V., von Schulthess, G. K., Kaufmann, P. A., Huellner, M. W., & Messerli, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Messerli, Michael
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Radiology
- Published
- 2019-12-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2031-2040
- ISSN
- 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1084
- OpenAlex
- W2993410833
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- GE Healthcare - institutional grant
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- small pulmonary nodules, 18F-FDG PET/CT, OSEM, image reconstruction, standardized uptake value, nodule size, diagnostic accuracy, lung cancer staging
- MeSH terms
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Deep Learning, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Solitary Pulmonary Nodule, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Radiopharmaceuticals, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Multiple Pulmonary Nodules
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review