Initial chest radiographs and artificial intelligence (AI) predict clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients: analysis of 697 Italian patients
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To evaluate whether the initial chest X-ray (CXR) severity assessed by an AI system may have prognostic utility in patients with COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) between February 25 and April 9, 2020, with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed on real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Initial CXRs obtained on ED presentation were evaluated by a deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) system and compared with the Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) score, calculated by two experienced radiologists. Death and critical COVID-19 (admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or deaths occurring before ICU admission) were identified as clinical outcomes. Independent predictors of adverse outcomes were evaluated by multivariate analyses. Results: Six hundred ninety-seven 697 patients were included in the study: 465 males (66.7%), median age of 62 years (IQR 52–75). Multivariate analyses adjusting for demographics and comorbidities showed that an AI system-based score ≥ 30 on the initial CXR was an independent predictor both for mortality (HR 2.60 (95% CI 1.69 − 3.99; p < 0.001)) and critical COVID-19 (HR 3.40 (95% CI 2.35–4.94; p < 0.001)). Other independent predictors were RALE score, older age, male sex, coronary artery disease, COPD, and neurodegenerative disease. Conclusion: AI- and radiologist-assessed disease severity scores on CXRs obtained on ED presentation were independent and comparable predictors of adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04318366 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04318366). Key Points: • AI system–based score ≥ 30 and a RALE score ≥ 12 at CXRs performed at ED presentation are independent and comparable predictors of death and/or ICU admission in COVID-19 patients. • Other independent predictors are older age, male sex, coronary artery disease, COPD, and neurodegenerative disease. • The comparable performance of the AI system in relation to a radiologist-assessed score in predicting adverse outcomes may represent a game-changer in resource-constrained settings.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI can identify coronavirus within localized outbreaks of the disease and help reveal the nature of the virus.
“Based on that, AI can identify coronavirus within localized outbreaks of the disease and help reveal the nature of the virus [21].”
From Blockchain and AI-Based Solutions to Combat Coronavirus (COVID-19)-Like Epidemics: A Survey (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Mushtaq, J., Pennella, R., Lavalle, S., Colarieti, A., Steidler, S., Martinenghi, C. M. A., Palumbo, D., Esposito, A., Rovere-Querini, P., Tresoldi, M., Landoni, G., Ciceri, F., Zangrillo, A., & De Cobelli, F.
- Affiliations
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Radiology
- Published
- 2020-09-18
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1770-1779
- ISSN
- 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1084
- PMC
- PMC7499014
- OpenAlex
- W3087359029
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Radiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, chest radiography, artificial intelligence, deep learning, pulmonary edema, disease severity, mortality prediction, intensive care unit admission, prognostic factors, emergency department, SARS-CoV-2, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neurodegenerative diseases, age and sex risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Age Factors, Aged, Artificial Intelligence, Coronary Artery Disease, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Prognosis, Radiography, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Radiography, Thoracic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Comorbidity, Proportional Hazards Models, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review